Search for: "Fields v. Eu"
Results 661 - 680
of 882
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Oct 2010, 2:18 am
Trademark dispute between Easydate and EasyGroup (Class 46) United States US General Availability of client data on LinkedIn, Facebook, and Google sinks trade secrets claim: Sasqua Group v. [read post]
28 Jan 2023, 7:32 am
"EU rules require large companies and listed companies to publish regular reports on the social and environmental risks they face, and on how their activities impact people and the environment. [read post]
12 Apr 2013, 9:13 am
EU: one of the challenges of EU for Court of Justice has been to accommodate historically use-based and varying degrees of registration-based systems. [read post]
28 Dec 2015, 2:51 am
It is in fact the logical next step for the EU legislature to take in this field" and "a European copyright law would establish a truly unified legal framework, replacing the multitude of often opaque and sometimes conflicting national rules that presently exists. [read post]
24 Apr 2009, 10:00 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Think Tank Global Week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: ECJ gives Copad ruling on exhaustion and luxury goods; interpretation of Article 8(2) leads to new questions: Copad SA v Christian Dior couture SA, Vincent Gladel, as liquidator of Société industrielle lingerie (Class 46) (IPKat) China’s biggest ever patent dispute comes to a multi-million dollar end:… [read post]
27 Dec 2014, 2:19 am
And as the month ended the EU Commission said that it had serious doubts about Italian Communication Authority's (AGCOM) draft online copyright enforcement regulation. [read post]
18 Jun 2012, 3:50 am
Other cases included: Mr Peter Light v Hounslow Chronicle, Clause 1, 15/06/2012; RMT Union v Evening Standard, Clause 1, 15/06/2012; A man v The Scottish Sun, Clauses 1, 3, 15/06/2012; A man v Irish News, Clause 3, 15/06/2012; Mr Martin Robbins v Daily Mail, Clause 1, 15/06/2012; Mr Colin Cortbus v Daily Mail, Clause 1, 15/06/2012; Mrs Caroline Panesar v The Mail on Sunday, Clause 4, 15/06/2012; Mrs Caroline Panesar v Daily… [read post]
23 Mar 2012, 9:14 am
Taking note that the European Union (EU) has proposed a new privacy framework, participants emphasized the importance of the Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation (APEC) Data Privacy Subgroup, which plans to pursue international engagement, including with the EU, to promote the interoperability of regional approaches to data protection. (2) Development of a U.S. [read post]
26 May 2011, 2:02 am
If it did, then it would be a trap for the unwary in all the 26 other EU member states. [read post]
26 Aug 2022, 6:30 am
Birnbaum, and Haimavathi V. [read post]
26 Aug 2022, 6:30 am
Birnbaum, and Haimavathi V. [read post]
5 Dec 2021, 4:39 pm
The Guidelines seek to clarify for controllers and processors in the EU in identifying whether a processing activity constitutes a transfer to a third country or to an international organisation, and, as a result, whether they have to comply with the provisions of Chapter V of the GDPR. [read post]
19 Oct 2020, 4:28 pm
Note that there are two more cases pending Case C-746/18 H.K. v Prokurator (Opinion handed down by AG Pitruzzella 21 Jan 2020) as well as references from Germany from 2019 and Ireland from 2020. [read post]
3 Nov 2014, 3:05 am
Supreme Court dismisses appeal in Servier v Apotex. [read post]
29 Oct 2015, 3:00 am
More analysis of the GDPR’s removal process, including its relation to other EU laws and legal issues, will appear in my next post. [read post]
14 Jan 2011, 9:20 am
This can be shown most clearly in the field of international IP legislation. [read post]
7 Mar 2021, 4:34 pm
At the outset of the hearing the settlements were announced of 13 claims, including those brought Noel Fielding, Rebecca Loos, Rhodri Giggs and Ally McCoist. [read post]
21 Apr 2023, 6:00 am
Merger challenges, auto-dealer regulations, and FTC-EU cooperation relations are a few activities that came under fire. [read post]
11 May 2012, 2:27 am
This decision, although being ‘just’ a preliminary injunction, set the stage for the term ‘active hosting’ as used by the district court of Milan in its decision RTI v. [read post]
