Search for: "Fish and Wildlife Service, United States" Results 661 - 680 of 1,290
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Oct 2011, 5:06 pm
The Center for Biological Diversity, EPA and Intervenors filed a joint status report on September 30 0n settlement negotiations in the Endangered Species Act mega-lawsuit.In January, the Center for Biological Diversity and the Pesticide Action Network filed a complaint for declaratory and injunctive relief against EPA, alleging that EPA had failed to consult with the Fish and Wildlife Service and the National Marine Fisheries Service regarding the effects of… [read post]
22 Sep 2021, 12:42 pm by kblocher@hslf.org
Fish and Wildlife Service announced last week, largely because of extreme wolf-killing laws recently passed in Idaho and Montana. [read post]
20 May 2013, 1:32 pm by WIMS
Appealed from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California. [read post]
5 Jan 2015, 3:22 pm by Arthur F. Coon
  Cal Fire is the “lead agency” for the approval of NTMPs and related environmental reviews, and the FPR require it to establish interdisciplinary teams, including a representative of the California Department of Fish and Wildlife (DFW) “when possible,” to review such plans and their environmental impacts; DFW and other review team members serve in “advisory” roles assisting Cal Fire’s Director in this review and evaluation process. [read post]
6 Oct 2010, 11:03 am by Robert Horton
In compliance with a settlement agreement previously blogged about here, the Fish and Wildlife Service published a final rule (PDF) effective October 28, 2010 listing the African Penguin as "endangered" under the Endangered Species Act. [read post]
21 Dec 2011, 11:24 am by Steve Davies
The Service also previously proposed delisting gray wolves in all or parts of 29 states in the eastern half of the United States. [read post]
25 Mar 2015, 11:55 pm by Paul Weiland
The lower court dismissed the action on the grounds that the Fish and Wildlife Service issued a biological opinion and incidental take statement covering golf course operations. [read post]
3 Apr 2014, 11:08 am by Abbott & Kindermann
Department’s Environmental Review The Department of Fish and Game’s (now the Department of Fish and Wildlife) (“department”) EIR at issue in the case relates to the general planning and conservation steps resulting from the County’s specific plan. [read post]
30 Nov 2011, 1:26 pm by WIMS
Fish and Wildlife Service as well, but are being considered collectively as the Corps. [read post]
14 Mar 2012, 1:32 pm by WIMS
Appealed from the United States District Court for the District of Montana. [read post]
27 Nov 2018, 9:38 am by Scott Bomboy
United States Fish and Wildlife Service centers on the issue of whether land in Louisiana can be dedicated as a “critical habitat” to protect the endangered dusky gopher frog, which currently doesn’t live in the state. [read post]
6 Jun 2014, 8:33 am by WIMS
Fish and Wildlife Service extend comment period. . . [read post]
19 Aug 2020, 1:23 pm by kblocher@hslf.org
Fish and Wildlife Service to issue permits for the importation of elephant or lion trophies from Zimbabwe, Zambia or Tanzania, where these threatened and endangered populations urgently need additional protections. [read post]
21 Dec 2010, 7:16 pm by David Cassuto
David Cassuto (x-post from Animal Blawg) Speaking of the Endangered Species Act… This just in: After a thorough review of all the available science, the Fish and Wildlife Service has determined that the contiguous United States population of wolverine should be protected under the Endangered Species Act (ESA). [read post]
19 Dec 2010, 7:45 pm by David
David Cassuto And speaking of the Endangered Species Act… This just in: After a thorough review of all the available science, the Fish and Wildlife Service has determined that the contiguous United States population of wolverine should be protected under the Endangered Species Act (ESA). [read post]
20 Jan 2011, 12:32 pm by Conor McEvily
United States Fish and Wildlife ServiceDocket: 10-605Issue(s): Whether, under section 4 of the Endangered Species Act, the government must analyze all of the economic impacts of a “critical habitat” designation (regardless of whether the impacts are co-extensive with, or cumulative of, other causes), or instead only those impacts for which “critical habitat” designation is a “but for” cause.Certiorari stage documents:Opinion… [read post]