Search for: "Floyd v. State" Results 661 - 680 of 842
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Oct 2015, 12:42 pm by Kelly Phillips Erb
El Pais now reports that “acting in opposition” to the Fiscalía (think of it like our District Attorney), a higher state authority (the State Bar which defends the interest of Spain’s Treasury) wants the case to proceed. [read post]
14 May 2018, 6:47 am by Beth Graham
  According to a prior Disputing blog post: In Jody James Farms, JV v. [read post]
4 Sep 2013, 10:36 am
Then, that was a panel discussion that additionally included Lord Justice Floyd (also sitting on the UPC Rules of Procedure Committee), Alan Johnson (Bristows), and Richard Vary (Nokia). [read post]
19 Jan 2014, 7:20 am
 This is because, like all keen IP bloggers, they are in a state of perpetual catch-up: the moment we take time off to read a piece of news, give it some thought and then write it up, something else suddenly crops up while we're not looking. [read post]
7 Mar 2023, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
  The other three officers who participated in Floyd's murder are also serving shorter concurrent state and federal sentences. [read post]
7 Dec 2021, 8:44 am by Eugene Volokh
I'll begin by laying out a few categories of situations where the risk of reputational harm is especially serious, and then summarize the state of court decisions on the subject. [1.] [read post]
17 Feb 2019, 4:06 pm by INFORRM
IPSO has handed down a number of recent rulings: Resolution Statement 0782-18 Wilson v thesun.co.uk, 2 Privacy (2018), 1 Accuracy (2018), Resolved – IPSO mediation Resolution Statement 07827-18 Wilson v Mail Online, 1 Accuracy (2018), 2 Privacy (2018), Resolved – IPSO mediation 06605-18 McPartlin and Corbett v Woman, 2 Privacy (2018), No breach – after investigation 06604-18 McPartlin and Corbett v Now, 2 Privacy (2018), No breach – after… [read post]
9 Jun 2021, 4:41 am by SHG
They were debating whether much of the Supreme Court case of Dred Scott v. [read post]
8 Mar 2010, 4:36 pm
United States (Copyright Litigation Blog) (Property, intangible)   US Trade Marks – Decisions Precedential No. 7: TTAB deems internet printouts admissible via notice of reliance: Safer, Inc v OMS Investments, Inc (TTABlog) TTAB vacates 2008 fraud ruling in Herbaceuticals, Inc v Xel Pharmaceuticals, Inc (TTABlog) TTAB affirms 2(d) refusal of CARMINE’S design for restaurant services in view of two other CARMINE’S designs: In re Carmine's Broadway… [read post]
8 Mar 2010, 4:36 pm
United States (Copyright Litigation Blog) (Property, intangible)   US Trade Marks – Decisions Precedential No. 7: TTAB deems internet printouts admissible via notice of reliance: Safer, Inc v OMS Investments, Inc (TTABlog) TTAB vacates 2008 fraud ruling in Herbaceuticals, Inc v Xel Pharmaceuticals, Inc (TTABlog) TTAB affirms 2(d) refusal of CARMINE’S design for restaurant services in view of two other CARMINE’S designs: In re Carmine's Broadway… [read post]
9 Mar 2021, 9:05 pm by Ilya Somin
Since the killing of George Floyd and last year's protest movement attracted new attention to the issue, two states—Colorado and Connecticut—have enacted laws severely limiting qualified immunity for violations of their state constitutions. [read post]
30 Aug 2020, 3:47 pm by Alex Woolgar
Laws in this area are not universal or uniform (even as between states that are parties to the ECHR). [read post]
22 May 2022, 4:38 pm by Katherine Pompilio
  Kurup and Pompilio posted the Supreme Court’s ruling in Patel v. [read post]
29 Jul 2019, 6:00 am by Quinta Jurecic
Floyd, the Supreme Court held that a majority of state legislators may not pass judgment on the sincerity with which another of their number swore the oath of office. [read post]