Search for: "Floyd v. State"
Results 661 - 680
of 842
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Jun 2011, 2:06 pm
Childers v. [read post]
26 May 2011, 2:02 am
Floyd J dismissed the claimants' action. [read post]
21 May 2011, 11:15 am
Kentucky V. [read post]
11 May 2011, 12:13 am
Extended Border Search Doctrine: Suspicionless Searches of Computers and Cameras Need not be Conducted at Time and Place of Entry By: Houston Criminal Lawyer John Floyd and Paralegal Billy Sinclair It was a case of “first impression” for the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals—the case of United States v. [read post]
2 May 2011, 6:17 am
" Id. at 10 (quoting Highland Capital Mgmt., L.P. v. [read post]
27 Apr 2011, 10:30 am
The case was United States v. [read post]
9 Apr 2011, 9:07 am
The first ten in the first stage are different elements in the relevant state of the art and the eleventh is the conclusion the judge drew from them. [read post]
29 Mar 2011, 3:24 am
Back in November Mr Justice Floyd gave judgment in Football Dataco Ltd, The Scottish Premier League Limited, The Scottish Football League Limited and PA Sport UK Limited v Sportradar GmbH & and Sportradar AG [2010] EWHC 2911 (Ch), Chancery Division, England and Wales. [read post]
22 Mar 2011, 2:02 pm
Co. d/b/a The Post and Courier v. [read post]
14 Mar 2011, 4:30 am
")Pink Floyd - "The Trial" ("The evidence before the court is incontrovertible / There's no need for the jury to retire / In all my years of judging I have never heard before / Of someone more deserving the full penalty of law. [read post]
10 Mar 2011, 1:17 pm
Tambry and Suzanne were the lead plaintiffs in our case, Young v. [read post]
26 Feb 2011, 7:17 pm
Sch. v. [read post]
31 Jan 2011, 9:12 pm
Tokai v. [read post]
30 Jan 2011, 11:41 am
Justice Frankfurter put it in 1952 in Leland v. [read post]
20 Jan 2011, 11:06 am
Floyd J had found that the patent as it stood was invalid. [read post]
14 Jan 2011, 9:20 am
The lesson being if you are going to die, die in Indiana.Raskopf cited the case of CMG Worldwide v The Upper Deck Co., Inc case where he acted for the defendant. [read post]
20 Dec 2010, 2:05 am
(Class 46) United Kingdom EWCA: Unlicensed imprecision: Pink Floyd v EMI Records (1709 Blog) (IPKat) Just sue them! [read post]
20 Dec 2010, 12:25 am
On 14 December 2010 the Court of Appeal handed down judgment in the case of Pink Floyd Music Limited v EMI Records ([2010] EWCA Civ 1429) – a contractual dispute concerning downloading of music to iTunes. [read post]
8 Dec 2010, 1:49 am
Talking of Mr Justice Arnold, that very same judge drew the Kats' attention to a recent Patents Court for England and Wales decision of Mr Justice Floyd in Daiichi Sankyo v Comptroller of Patents in which Novartis was not allowed to join this case as a party in order to participate in its reference to the Court of Justice for a preliminary ruling. [read post]
7 Dec 2010, 11:42 am
United States. [read post]
