Search for: "Frye v Frye"
Results 661 - 680
of 682
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 May 2007, 5:27 am
The following is a glossary of a broad list of legal terms, civil and criminal, state and federal and not just those in a divorce or family law case. [read post]
5 May 2007, 1:32 pm
Sod Farms v. [read post]
2 May 2007, 6:02 am
Manson v. [read post]
30 Apr 2007, 11:58 am
Abdul-Wadood v. [read post]
28 Apr 2007, 6:45 am
Frye writes in a new paper on SSRN. [read post]
13 Apr 2007, 8:09 am
Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 509 U.S. 579 (1993), and Frye v. [read post]
10 Apr 2007, 9:17 pm
That is the general rule, I believe, but the odd facts of Frye v. [read post]
5 Apr 2007, 1:25 pm
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia case called Frye v. [read post]
2 Apr 2007, 7:00 am
Given the extreme importance of expert testimony to litigation, is the reliability test for expert testimony set out in Daubert v. [read post]
1 Apr 2007, 9:00 pm
LeGrand, a murder case in which the trial judge last year refused to admit expert testimony (PDF) on the reliability of eyewitness identifications, and further held that such evidence is unreliable under the "general acceptance" standard set forth in Frye v. [read post]
30 Mar 2007, 1:32 am
Fried, J., at Frye hearing, and William A. [read post]
28 Mar 2007, 10:07 pm
LeGrand, a murder case in which the trial judge last year refused to admit expert testimony (PDF) on the reliability of eyewitness identifications, and further held that such evidence is unreliable under the "general acceptance" standard set forth in Frye v. [read post]
27 Mar 2007, 4:16 pm
Criminal defense practitioners take note of People v LeGrand, 2007 NY Slip Op 02588, a decision handed down bythe New York Court of Appeals today. [read post]
27 Mar 2007, 2:30 am
LeGrand, a murder case in which the trial judge last year refused to admit expert testimony (PDF) on the reliability of eyewitness identifications, and further held that such evidence is unreliable under the "general acceptance" standard set forth in Frye v. [read post]
15 Feb 2007, 9:58 am
LeGrand, a case in which the trial judge last year refused to admit expert testimony (PDF) on the reliability of eyewitness identifications, and further held that such evidence is unreliable under the "general acceptance" standard set forth in Frye v. [read post]
28 Jan 2007, 9:33 am
Frye made `general acceptance' the exclusive test for admitting expert scientific testimony. [read post]
23 Jan 2007, 4:02 pm
In Capital v. [read post]
18 Jan 2007, 10:48 am
Kelly (1976) 17 Cal.3d 24, the California Supreme Court adopted the standard set forth in the District of Columbia Circuit's decision in Frye v. [read post]
19 Dec 2006, 12:12 am
NEW YORK COUNTYEvidenceEngineer's Expert Testimony on Accident Reconstruction Precluded Under 'Frye' Standard Thorne v. [read post]
17 Nov 2006, 5:12 pm
The panel held: [T]he State may move to introduce HGN tests without the need for a Frye evidentiary hearing. [read post]
