Search for: "GONZALES v. STATE" Results 661 - 680 of 1,204
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Oct 2014, 10:41 am by Ryan Scoville
And even if one disagrees with Holland, the Court’s more recent decision in Gonzales v. [read post]
22 Apr 2010, 10:00 pm by Michael
Bettinger-López, the Human Rights Clinic, and the ACLU currently represent Gonzales in Jessica Gonzales v. [read post]
30 Sep 2007, 10:11 pm
For example, in cases concerning the right to choose "partial-birth" abortion and the right to use medical marijuana, the Supreme Court reached radically different results, based on radically different reasoning.More recent developments, including last Term's decision in Gonzales v. [read post]
15 Feb 2012, 7:45 am by Ilya Somin
Former VC-er Erik Jaffe is the counsel of record on this amicus brief for Docs4Patient Care, the Benjamin Rush Society, the Pacific Research Institute, the Galen Institute, and Angel Raich (of Gonzales v. [read post]
19 Jan 2010, 7:51 pm
As mentioned in her post below, she's filed Jessica Gonzales v. [read post]
5 Apr 2009, 12:30 pm
Essays Randy Beck, Gonzales, Casey, and the Viability Rule, 103 Nw. [read post]
25 Jun 2012, 1:08 pm
v=Sn5breXYmD4"} ) Read the Supreme Court's complete decision with annotations: Monday's NewsHour broadcast will feature analysis from the National Law Journal's Marcia Coyle, followed by a debate on the impact of today's decision with Kansas Secretary of State Kris Kobach, who helped write the bill at the center of the case, and Steven Gonzales, who teaches constitutional law at the Phoenix School of Law and is a member of Los Abogados,… [read post]
14 Apr 2020, 9:00 pm by Joanna L. Grossman and Mary Ziegler
Under Roe, state laws banning or restrictively regulating abortion were invalid.After two decades of backlash and maneuvering by the anti-abortion movement (including violence against clinics and providers), the Court revisited Roe in Planned Parenthood v. [read post]
4 Oct 2010, 1:07 pm by Ilya Somin
Among other things, it explains why the mandate runs afoul of the five part test established in the Supreme Court’s most recent Necessary and Proper Clause decision, United States v. [read post]
11 Jan 2013, 7:35 am by Guest Blogger
  Writing for four Justices in Gonzales v. [read post]
18 Feb 2011, 9:29 am by Randy Barnett
The mandate also fails to satisfy an alternative to the substantial effects doctrine that was proposed by Justice Scalia in a concurring opinion in Gonzales v. [read post]