Search for: "General Corporation v. General Motors Corporation" Results 661 - 680 of 865
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Feb 2010, 10:57 am by admin
  9622(i), notice is hereby given of a proposed administrative settlement for costs associated with a removal action at the Anderson-Calhoun Mine and Mill Site in Leadpoint, Washington, with settling party Blue Tee Corporation. [read post]
24 Feb 2010, 1:14 am by John Day
General Motors Acceptance Corp., 298 U. [read post]
11 Feb 2010, 4:13 pm by MJIL
Supreme Court opinion in Massachusetts v. [read post]
31 Jan 2010, 7:16 pm by admin
Agriculture & Nutrition, LLC, Syngenta Crop Protection, Inc., and Olin Corporation. [read post]
25 Jan 2010, 3:51 am
(IP tango) ECJ sets aside partial refusal to grant CTM for ‘Vorsprung durch Technik’ (progress through technology): Audi AG v OHIM (Class 46) (IPKat) (The IP Factor) ECJ: Davidoff criteria for exhaustion apply also if goods were first marketed within the EEA: Makro Zelfbedieningsgroothandel CV and others v Diesel SpA (JIPLP) Time for a general grumble - General Court decisions missing images, no English version: G-Star Raw Denim kft v OHIM,… [read post]
25 Jan 2010, 3:01 am by John L. Welch
American Motors Corporation, Cancellation No. 92045099 (January 14, 2010) suggests that "reckless disregard" may suffice. [read post]
21 Jan 2010, 3:45 pm by Lyle Denniston
General Motors might already be halfway to winning its lawsuit. [read post]
29 Dec 2009, 5:50 pm by admin
Magistrate Amy Reynolds Hay of Pittsburgh ruled Tuesday that PennEnvironment couldn’t prove that excessive discharge levels from Reliant Energy’s Conemaugh Generating Station near New Florence caused damage to the river. [read post]
29 Dec 2009, 5:46 pm by smtaber
Magistrate Amy Reynolds Hay of Pittsburgh ruled Tuesday that PennEnvironment couldn’t prove that excessive discharge levels from Reliant Energy’s Conemaugh Generating Station near New Florence caused damage to the river. [read post]
28 Dec 2009, 12:00 am
’: Tribunal Practice Notice 6/2009 Requirement to attend hearings in relations to applications for invalidation where there are grounds of invalidation under sections 5(1), 5(2), 5(3) and/or 5(4) of the Trade Marks Act 1994 (IPKat) Why automotive engineers don’t end up as patent infringers – Ian Hartwell reports findings of survey of UK and German engineering companies (IPKat) Web Sheriff takes on Jamie Oliver for dressing like member of The Village People without permission… [read post]
19 Dec 2009, 5:27 am
Before they began their work, the business judgment rule generally was seen as a barrier to judicial review of the substantive merits of board decisions. [read post]
7 Dec 2009, 3:00 am
Hyundai Motor America (Seattle Trademark Lawyer) Cal App 4th guidance on pre-discovery trade secret disclosures: Perlan Therapeutics, Inc. v. [read post]
6 Dec 2009, 6:48 pm
Then 1973 rolled around and all of a sudden General Motors, Ford, Chrysler and American Motors… the Big 4, if you can remember that far back… all seemed terribly out of step with what was going on in the world. [read post]
28 Nov 2009, 4:23 pm
   (f) (1) For purposes of this section, "personal information" does not include publicly available information that is lawfully made available to the general public from federal, state, or local government records. [read post]