Search for: "Goodwill, Inc."
Results 661 - 680
of 1,382
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Mar 2014, 6:50 am
Reynolds Consumer Products, Inc. v. [read post]
31 Jul 2014, 4:39 am
Alex & Chloe, Inc., No. [read post]
20 May 2013, 6:56 am
’”); McNeilab, Inc. v. [read post]
21 Jun 2013, 7:45 am
According to the trial judge, two of the three elements of passing off were present, but that there had been no misrepresentation leading the public to believe that Sweet Squared's products were those of Lumos: Sweet Squared had only modest goodwill in the LUMOS mark by the time Sweet Squared began selling its products, and that goodwill did not extend beyond a particular niche within the market. [read post]
Precedential No. 15: TTAB Refuses Concurrent Use Registration of DELMONICO'S For Restaurant Services
15 Jun 2015, 3:12 am
Southwestern Management, Inc. v. [read post]
1 Dec 2022, 11:12 am
Inc. v. [read post]
18 May 2015, 11:01 am
* Reputation, goodwill and passing off in the UK: a further look ...Following David's post on the UK Supreme Court's hot-off-the-press ruling in Starbucks v British Sky Broadcasting, Katfriend Flora Cook (Kilburn & Strode) pens another note on that judgment, thinking about it from the perspective of what it means to a litigant who has nothing at his disposal but an unregistered trade mark, known by some members of the public (ie having a… [read post]
8 Dec 2007, 7:17 am
Moses Boulevard, Suite 370 Dayton, OH 45408 Phone: (937) 461-3305 E-mail: trcdoh@aol.com Dayton Microcomputer Association 301 Valley Street Dayton, OH 45404 Phone: (513) 229-3657 Web: http://www.dma.org Disabled Electronic Resource Exchange Project Project dERE Inc., North 3985 Osage Street Gahanna, OH 44224-3503 Phone: (330) 686-6570 Web: http://users1.ee.netcddir/dere.htm#mark6 M.U.S.I.C. [read post]
7 Nov 2007, 5:17 am
Beseder Inc., 2007 WL 3238703 (D. [read post]
19 Jan 2012, 9:54 pm
., Inc., 673A.2d 148 (Del. 1996) in my casebook, but it's an interesting case nonetheless. [read post]
22 Sep 2009, 3:59 am
Such a use cannot therefore be considered as being a use made in relation to goods or services identical or similar to those covered by the trade marks [even if it affects the mark's essential function or damages its goodwill? [read post]
11 Jun 2019, 6:26 am
A recent federal court decision from the District of Massachusetts in Nuvasive Inc. v. [read post]
1 Jul 2018, 8:16 am
., Inc. v. [read post]
6 Apr 2010, 9:30 am
Airborne Health, Inc. v. [read post]
29 Jun 2007, 12:40 pm
Phoenix of Broward, Inc. v. [read post]
4 Oct 2019, 6:14 am
Life After Hate, Inc. v. [read post]
27 Dec 2011, 7:18 am
MSS HiFi, Inc., 2011 WL 6355215 (S.D.N.Y.) [read post]
30 Nov 2020, 8:14 am
To do that analysis, the Titan court relied principally on Marsh USA Inc. v. [read post]
22 Aug 2010, 12:22 pm
Perhaps Pinkberry, Inc. [read post]
6 Oct 2012, 3:29 am
Avaya Inc. v. [read post]
