Search for: "Gordon v. Gordon"
Results 661 - 680
of 2,586
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Aug 2018, 1:16 am
More from our authors: Mediation: Creating Value in International Intellectual Property Disputes by Théophile Margellos, Sophia Bonne, Gordon Humphreys, Sven Stürmann € The post United Kingdom: Edwards Lifesciences LLC v Boston Scientific Scimed Inc, High Court of Justice of England and Wales, Chancery Division, Patents Court, [2018] EWHC 1256 (Pat), 24 May 2018 appeared first on Kluwer… [read post]
10 Aug 2018, 12:02 am
More from our authors: Mediation: Creating Value in International Intellectual Property Disputes by Théophile Margellos, Sophia Bonne, Gordon Humphreys, Sven Stürmann € Design Rights, Functionality and Scope of Protection by Chris Carani€ 199 The post USA: Excelled Sheepskin & Leather Coat Corp. v. [read post]
8 Aug 2018, 11:15 pm
SAS Institute Inc. v. [read post]
8 Aug 2018, 3:52 pm
The case that the insurer is relying on and that Judge Gordon cited in his opinion here is the Sixth Circuit’s 2012 opinion in Tooling, Manufacturing and Technologies Association v. [read post]
8 Aug 2018, 10:30 am
MCA Records, Inc.), a hip hop record label (20th Century Fox Television v. [read post]
8 Aug 2018, 6:12 am
Gordon v. [read post]
7 Aug 2018, 10:36 am
Anders ValentinIn a recent judgement rendered by the Danish Maritime and Commercial Court (SH2018.T-3-16 – Hexa-Cover A/S et al v. [read post]
1 Aug 2018, 6:40 am
Whereas the Eli Lilly v. [read post]
31 Jul 2018, 4:06 pm
Breeden reported that she could see that they were headed straight for two large docked vessels, the 330-foot F/V GORDON JENSEN and the 400-foot cargo ship SOHOH. [read post]
31 Jul 2018, 2:02 pm
Jewel v. [read post]
31 Jul 2018, 10:00 am
Superior Court (Alfred) (1961) 189 CA2d 6, agents or employees Gordon v. [read post]
31 Jul 2018, 7:58 am
Accordingly, it seems reasonable to interpret the Teva v. [read post]
31 Jul 2018, 4:26 am
Moreover, to the extent that the plaintiff’s action may be premature because, while the underlying action is pending, it cannot be determined whether the defendant’s alleged legal malpractice proximately caused the plaintiff to sustain damages (see generally Shumsky v Eisenstein, 96 NY2d 164, 166; Ackerman v Price Waterhouse, 84 NY2d 535, 542-543; Hershco v Gordon & Gordon, 155 AD3d 1006; Stein Indus., Inc.… [read post]
30 Jul 2018, 10:56 am
Were I a teenager or tween or even twenty-something, perhaps I'd know the background of the catch phrases "Honey Badger Don't Care" and "Honey Badger Don't Give A Sh**. [read post]
27 Jul 2018, 4:30 am
“On a motion to dismiss under CPLR 3211, the pleading is to be given a liberal construction, the allegations contained within it are assumed to be true and the plaintiff is to be afforded every favorable inference” (Simkin v Blank, 19 NY3d 46, 52; see Leon v Martinez, 84 NY2d 83, 87; Hershco v Gordon & Gordon, 155 AD3d 1007, 1008). [read post]
26 Jul 2018, 6:53 am
A full summary of this case has been published on Kluwer IP Law More from our authors: Mediation: Creating Value in International Intellectual Property Disputes by Théophile Margellos, Sophia Bonne, Gordon Humphreys, Sven Stürmann € The post USA: Raytheon Co. v. [read post]
25 Jul 2018, 12:16 am
More from our authors: Mediation: Creating Value in International Intellectual Property Disputes by Théophile Margellos, Sophia Bonne, Gordon Humphreys, Sven Stürmann € Design Rights, Functionality and Scope of Protection by Chris Carani€ 199 The post USA: Pinkette Clothing, Inc. v. [read post]
24 Jul 2018, 11:59 pm
More from our authors: Mediation: Creating Value in International Intellectual Property Disputes by Théophile Margellos, Sophia Bonne, Gordon Humphreys, Sven Stürmann € The post USA: Swartz v. [read post]
19 Jul 2018, 9:43 pm
The Senior Costs Judge Master Gordon-Saker prefaced his recent decision on proportionality, in Various Claimants (In Wave 1 of the Mirror Newspapers Hacking Litigation) v MGN Ltd [2018] EWHC B13 (Costs), with the warning: “this judgment should not be taken as any attempt at providing guidance. [read post]
12 Jul 2018, 6:19 am
The Warner-Lambert v Actavis case concerning the drug pregabalin was heard by the Supreme Court in mid-February 2018 and considered, among other things, plausibility, infringement of second medical use patents and abuse of process. [read post]
