Search for: "Gould v. Gould"
Results 661 - 680
of 946
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Feb 2011, 1:59 am
Oct. 29, 2007) (citing Shea & Gould v. [read post]
28 Jun 2011, 6:03 am
With partner Frank Gould, Norm was a pretty cool lawyer. [read post]
9 Jun 2010, 3:21 am
In Gould v Board of Education, 81 NY2d 446, the New York State Court of Appeals held that a "tenured teacher has a protected property interest in [his or] her position and a right to retain it subject to being discharged for cause in accordance with the provisions of [the Education Law]. [read post]
21 Feb 2011, 7:52 am
United States v. [read post]
4 Oct 2024, 5:28 am
” “Here, Russo defendants demonstrated that they were not properly served since Carroll was not authorized to accept service on behalf of Russo & Gould. [read post]
25 May 2018, 4:15 am
” Additional commentary comes from William Gould at Stanford Law School’s Legal Aggregate blog and Arthur Sapper at Ogletree Deakins. [read post]
20 Sep 2008, 3:02 pm
See blog here, discussing United States v. [read post]
4 Jun 2010, 11:27 am
Facebook and Gould v. [read post]
27 Oct 2015, 2:30 am
Another excellent panel on Campbell-Ewald Corp. v. [read post]
25 Jul 2014, 11:20 am
: Congress v. the Supreme Court Damon Root, Overruled: The Long War for Control of the U.S. [read post]
29 May 2008, 3:35 pm
Gould, 526 F. [read post]
19 Oct 2015, 12:32 pm
* AIPPI Congress Report 3: Trying to resolve the global puzzle of inventor remuneration******************PREVIOUSLY, ON NEVER TOO LATE Never Too Late 67 - [week ending on Sunday 11 October] – Eponia rumours | Batmobile and copyright | EPO and human rights | Gucci v Guess | NOCN (Formerly National Open College Network) v Open College Network Credit4Learning | New CJEU reference on linking and copyright | Viennese waltz may be the last… [read post]
22 Aug 2014, 10:26 am
By contrast,“legislative facts,” the Court held, are “established truths, facts or pronouncements that do not change from case to case but apply universally” (Id. at 812, quoting United States v Gould, 536 F2d 216, 220 [8th Cir 1976]). [read post]
5 Oct 2015, 5:13 am
* Glenn Gould and the case for moral rights in sound recordingsKatfriend Mira T. [read post]
9 May 2025, 6:00 am
Assoc. v State Div. of Human Rights, 45 NY2d 176, 180; see Matter of Ciganik v New York City Off. of Admin. [read post]
9 May 2025, 6:00 am
Assoc. v State Div. of Human Rights, 45 NY2d 176, 180; see Matter of Ciganik v New York City Off. of Admin. [read post]
28 Jun 2011, 12:33 am
The cross-examination of Mr Gould did not show that a system could not have been built based on the draft standards: it merely showed that it would not have been possible to guess what choices would be made in the final standards, and that if there was a difference the phone would not work. [read post]
6 May 2012, 3:23 pm
United States v. [read post]
26 Apr 2010, 1:26 pm
Gould, 568 F.3d 459, 470–72 (4th Cir. 2009); United States v. [read post]
17 Jun 2024, 3:41 am
Moreover, the complaint fails to allege fraud with any particularity (see CPLR 3016[b]; see Browne v Lyft, Inc., 219 AD3d 445, 447 [2d Dept 2023]; Shah v Mitra, 171 ADed 971, 976 [2d Dept 2019]). [read post]
