Search for: "Graves v. United States" Results 661 - 680 of 1,614
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Dec 2023, 7:32 am by Pablo Arredondo
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK  December 21, 2024 Genesis Technology v. [read post]
11 Jul 2008, 5:30 am
Such renditions have been celebrated as crucial in the fight against impunity for grave crimes.In the United States, "rendition to justice," in which a suspect is apprehended and transferred to the United States for criminal prosecution, was approved and formalized by President Reagan and expanded by President George H.W. [read post]
20 Jan 2015, 3:41 am by Janet Kentridge, Matrix
(See paragraph 28, referring to Royal College of Nursing of the United Kingdom v Department of Health and Social Security [1981] AC 800 (HL)). [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 12:32 pm by Eugene Volokh
Drake, M.D., today (June 24) issued the following statement on the United States Supreme Court's decision in Dobbs v. [read post]
6 May 2013, 7:44 am by The Charge
  Thus, the state of Maryland did not offend the United States Constitution when it denied counsel to Mr. [read post]
9 Nov 2023, 5:44 am by Offit Kurman
In a recent decision by the Roanoke Division of the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Co. v. [read post]
9 Jan 2014, 8:24 am by Clara Spera
 The United States is ranked eleventh. [read post]
4 Sep 2013, 12:13 pm by Stephen Bilkis
The United States Constitution guarantees the right to trial by a jury of one's peers. [read post]
3 Jul 2018, 11:12 am by David Kopel
In 1998, the Supreme Court issued its most important modern decision on the Excessive Fines Clause, United States v. [read post]
21 Jul 2017, 9:51 am by Staff Writer
Its initial purpose was to combat organized crime in the United States. [read post]
5 Jan 2016, 4:01 pm by Cody M. Poplin
As the sectarian crisis in the Middle East continues to deepen, Iran appears intent on aggravating the United States. [read post]
14 Nov 2018, 1:50 pm by John Floyd
United States had an opportunity to interpret the broad reach of the JVTA. [read post]
8 Mar 2012, 3:58 am by Rosalind English
 Because of SIAC’s order she would be unable to alert the foreign state to the risk, thereby gravely imperilling lives, as well as future diplomatic relations. [read post]
17 Jun 2005, 2:55 pm
Although international criminal law (which includes the laws of war pertaining to war crimes and grave breaches, as well as genocide and crimes against humanity) imposes obligations on non-state actors, the only type of non-state actors on whom it imposes obligations are natural individuals. [read post]