Search for: "HAYES v. HAYES"
Results 661 - 680
of 1,119
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Dec 2010, 9:06 am
Here, summary judgment dismissing plaintiff's cause of action alleging a breach of fiduciary duty was properly granted since defendants met their burden on their motion and, in opposition, plaintiff failed to raise a question of fact that defendants' breach proximately caused it any ascertainable damages (see Boone v Bender, 74 AD3d at 1113; Brodeur v Hayes, 18 AD3d 979, 980-981 [2005], lv dismissed and denied 5 NY3d 871 [2005]). [read post]
30 Apr 2018, 6:03 pm
Hayes, 771 So.2d 462, 465 (Ala. 2000). [read post]
11 Aug 2008, 5:51 pm
" Sue Hayes v. [read post]
20 Jun 2021, 4:14 pm
In the Brisbane District Court, Judge Reid in BeautyFULL CMC Pty Ltd v Hayes [2021] QDC 111 found former Beautyfull Cosmetic Medical Clinic employee Clare Hayes defamed the clinic’s owners in an Instagram story, which is a post on the social network generally only visible for 24 hours. [read post]
28 Nov 2023, 5:01 am
See Roe v. [read post]
5 Apr 2009, 7:00 am
The court thus rejected plaintiff's attempt to have NOGE treated on the same basis as other faith-based groups in prison.In Hayes v. [read post]
5 Sep 2007, 1:44 pm
Hayes continues to inform the issue of reportorial privilege. [read post]
7 Dec 2010, 5:33 am
’” Eastex, Inc. v. [read post]
13 Oct 2010, 2:04 pm
Avgiris, Comment, Huddle up: surveying the playing field on the single entity status of the National Football League in anticipation of American Needle v. [read post]
28 Mar 2010, 8:33 pm
Jonathan Hayes. [read post]
4 Aug 2009, 7:47 am
Neither Terrapin v Builders Supply Co (Hayes) [1967] RPC 375 nor Cranleigh Precision Engineering Ltd v Bryant [1965] 1 WLR 1293 QBD was authority for that proposition [If Kats could blush, this one would be pretty pink -- he's sure he has persuaded a generation of students of the opposite, confident that Speed Seal Products Ltd v Paddington [1985] 1 WLR 1327 CA said this was the case];* There was strong authority for the proposition that publication of… [read post]
28 Jul 2008, 2:35 pm
Hayes (07-608) — ban on gun possession after conviction for domestic violence Melendez-Diaz v. [read post]
5 Oct 2020, 9:05 am
In recent times, the Supreme Court ruling in Bush v. [read post]
26 May 2020, 4:17 pm
Harassment is “a persistent and deliberate course of unreasonable and oppressive conduct, targeted at another person, which is calculated to and does cause that person alarm, fear or distress”: Hayes v Willoughby [2013] UKSC 17. [read post]
5 Jun 2018, 8:00 am
See Kessel v. [read post]
5 Jun 2018, 8:00 am
See Kessel v. [read post]
18 Dec 2008, 3:51 am
" "Inasmuch as plaintiff's submissions in response failed to raise any issues of fact regarding negligence, proximate cause or damages, Supreme Court properly dismissed plaintiff's legal malpractice cause of action (see Guiles v Simser, 35 AD3d 1054, 1055-1056 [2006]; Antokol & Coffin v Myers, 30 AD3d 843, 845-846 [2006]; Lichtenstein v Barenbaum, 23 AD3d 440, 440-441 [2005]; Brodeur v Hayes, 18 AD3d 979, 980-981… [read post]
14 Apr 2019, 7:54 am
Germany, Jr. v. [read post]
17 Oct 2017, 5:02 am
Case Law: OPO v MLA, Shock and disbelief at the Court of Appeal – Dan Tench Case Law: ETK v News Group Newspapers “Privacy Injunctions and Children” – Edward Craven Case Preview: Jack Monroe v Katie Hopkins, Twitter libel trial about meaning and serious harm Case Law: “Spiller v Joseph – the New Defence of Honest Comment” – Catherine Rhind Case Law: Iqbal v Dean Manson, harassment by letter – Edward… [read post]
22 Dec 2017, 2:35 am
– Philip Steele News: Privacy injunction granted against the Sun, first reported privacy injunction of 2017 Case Report: Jack Monroe v Katie Hopkins, Days 1 and 2: claimant’s evidence and defendant’s closing submissions Case Law: Jack Monroe v Katie Hopkins, Success for claimant in Twitter libel case – Nathan Capone Case Law, India: Puttaswamy v Union of India, Supreme Court recognises a constitutional right to privacy in a landmark judgment –… [read post]
