Search for: "HOME PRODUCTS INTERNATIONAL V. UNITED STATES "
Results 661 - 680
of 1,021
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Apr 2008, 7:26 am
TIMES, Dec. 27, 2007, available at [topics.nytimes.com] [2] Allan Lengel, New-Home Sales Fell Record 26 Last Year, WASHINGTON POST, Jan. 29, 2008, at D01, available at [www.washingtonpost.com] [3] Martin Crutsinger, New Home Sales Took Record Fall in 2007, INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS TIMES, Jan. 28, 2008, available at [www.ibtimes.com] [4] James R. [read post]
12 Oct 2009, 7:40 am
The union brought the action to the International Trade Commission ("ITC") in April, citing that from 2004 to 2008, imports of cheap consumer tires from China increased 215 percent, boosting Chinese market shares of tires in the U.S. from 4.7 percent to 17.3 percent while domestic production declined by roughly 25 percent. [3] As a result, United Steelworkers allege that over 5,000 American tire workers have lost their jobs and four tire plants have… [read post]
21 Nov 2008, 1:36 pm
Don’t give up (International Law Office) Morocco Morocco hopes to benefit from Iranian technology expertise (Afro-IP) Netherlands Medical aid association Eers [read post]
7 Sep 2012, 5:24 am
When Ashley returned home she called 911. [read post]
2 Jan 2015, 10:47 am
See, Animal Welfare International Inc. v. [read post]
21 Apr 2014, 1:19 pm
In the case of Huerta v. [read post]
3 Apr 2017, 6:34 pm
The story is told in: Ross Thomson, Structures of Change in the Mechanical Age: Technological Innovation in the United States 1790-1865 (2009); Alexander Rose, American Rifle: A Biography (2008); David R. [read post]
17 Jun 2023, 6:25 am
Circuit explained in its 1980 FTC v. [read post]
4 Apr 2023, 11:55 am
” Olson v. [read post]
21 Dec 2009, 5:24 am
Century City Apartments Property Services CC and Another v Century City Property Owners Association (Afro-IP) Spain A branding miracle from: from bullring to shop windows (Class 46) Ukraine Ukrainian Higher Economic Court denies Ferrero’s claim on Raffaello trade mark infringement: Group Ferrero v Landrin (Class 46) United Kingdom EWHC on compensation for employee inventors whose patents are particularly beneficial to employers: Shanks… [read post]
22 Feb 2008, 6:00 pm
Signature Financial Group, Inc., and AT&T Corp. v. [read post]
11 Jul 2019, 11:40 am
For example, the Excess Lines Association of New York requires that surplus lines premium taxes be remitted “only to New York for New York ‘home stated’ [RPG] members” while recognizing that “other states may handle [RPG] filings differently and consider the ‘insured’s home state’ to be the state where the [RPG] is headquartered . . . . [read post]
21 Jan 2024, 12:05 am
The appellants argued that the products were called ‘poppadoms, unlike potato crisps’. [read post]
31 May 2012, 5:16 am
The Delaware court sets the standard of review using the the four-factor formula set forth by the United States Supreme Court in Reves v. [read post]
3 Dec 2014, 9:54 am
And a federal court has recently agreed, because on April 10, 2014, the United States District Court for the Southern District of California ruled that A’lor is barred from infringing CHARRIOL cable trademarks by selling ALOR jewelry that uses such cable. [read post]
27 Feb 2009, 7:00 am
(The IP Factor) Uganda Anti-counterfeits conference held in Kampala (Afro-IP) United Kingdom IP rights in the Court of Appeal, but not as we know them...: Office of Communications v Information Commissioner (IPKat) IPO review of practice before Patent Tribunal (PatLit) Employee inventor compensation: an expensive pastime? [read post]
17 Jun 2019, 2:17 pm
Both patent law and trademark law are administered by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO). [read post]
21 Jan 2021, 12:54 pm
Hawaii Land Use Commission, 20-54, bought a thousand-acre tract of land in Hawaii on which it planned to build hundreds of homes. [read post]
13 Jun 2008, 3:40 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: ECJ rules trade mark holders cannot stop honest comparative advertising: O2 Holdings Limited and O2 (UK) Limited v Hutchinson 3G UK Limited: (Out-Law), (Catch Us If You Can!!!) [read post]
25 Aug 2008, 10:27 am
State Bd. of Exam'rs. of Pub. [read post]
