Search for: "Hale v. Hale"
Results 661 - 680
of 1,333
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Sep 2015, 4:30 am
The Supreme Court Decision As Lady Hale explained, the Court’s view was that a principled solution to the case would have been to treat the care component of DLA as an invalidity benefit for the purposes of the Regulation rather than as a short term benefit, and therefore freely exportable under Article 10. [read post]
27 Aug 2014, 7:17 am
Socha v. [read post]
16 Nov 2020, 4:10 pm
In Steel v United Kingdom ((2005) 41 EHRR 22) the Court found violations of Article 6 and Article 10 ECHR. [read post]
4 Jul 2011, 12:39 am
v. [read post]
6 Aug 2017, 4:42 pm
Judgment of the Supreme Court Lord Sumption (with whom Lady Hale and Lords Neuberger, Clarke and Reed agreed) gave the judgment of the majority. [read post]
10 Jun 2008, 5:47 pm
The award of attorney fees in favor of the Hales is therefore unwarranted. [read post]
1 Nov 2010, 4:30 am
Leja v. [read post]
13 Apr 2018, 9:00 am
In Hale v. [read post]
13 Apr 2018, 9:00 am
In Hale v. [read post]
20 Feb 2017, 1:00 am
The hand down panel will be Lady Hale, Lord Carnwath and Lord Hodge. [read post]
20 Jan 2016, 7:41 am
Corp. v. [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 4:07 pm
Rix LJ also referred to the distinction drawn by Baroness Hale in Majrowski v Guy’s and St Thomas’ NHS Trust [2006] UKHL 34, [2007] 1 AC 224 between “the ordinary banter and badinage of life and genuinely offensive and unacceptable behaviour”. [read post]
1 Sep 2020, 12:54 am
The court referred back to the second value that Baroness Hale had identified in Countryside Alliance, namely “the inviolability of … the personal and psychological space”. [read post]
30 Jan 2019, 2:48 am
Lady Hale gave a concurring judgment in which she agreed with Lord Sumption that, given the need for a practicable and proportionate scheme, bright-line rules are necessary, and that the categories used are proportionate, save as to the two exceptions Lord Sumption identified. [read post]
21 Mar 2018, 8:35 am
While Lady Hale does not comment on the test itself, she conceives that arguments could be made against its application in relation to the question of fairness. [read post]
2 Oct 2021, 5:19 pm
(McGee v. [read post]
22 Aug 2024, 5:37 am
" Thus, for instance, U.S. v. [read post]
19 Sep 2020, 8:29 am
(See ALS Scan, Inc. v. [read post]
23 Aug 2011, 2:56 pm
See Silver v. [read post]
26 Nov 2015, 1:00 am
” Supreme Court The appeal was heard by Lord Neuberger, Lady Hale, Lord Dyson, Lord Reed and Lord Toulson on the 12 and 13 October 2015. [read post]
