Search for: "Herbert v. Herbert"
Results 661 - 680
of 830
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Nov 2009, 7:41 am
Having only recently reviewed the logo sponsorship deal in Force India v Etihad (see earlier post here), the IPKat finds himself perusing Hudson Bay Apparel Brands LLC v Umbro International Ltd [2009] EWHC B28 (Ch), a Chancery Division (England and Wales) decision of Deputy Judge Mark Herbert QC, dating back to 4 November 2009.Umbro, an English company [owned by Nike] which enjoyed the fruits of an international licensing business based principally on football products,… [read post]
16 Nov 2009, 8:38 pm
Jayne Barnard was kind enough to host me at William & Mary last week as part of the 2009-10 Herbert V. [read post]
16 Nov 2009, 8:38 pm
Jayne Barnard was kind enough to host me at William & Mary last week as part of the 2009-10 Herbert V. [read post]
28 Oct 2009, 3:21 am
Regina v Greene (Jeremy Herbert) Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) “Where a judge ruled that a witness could be treated as hostile at trial within the meaning of section 3 of the Criminal Procedure Act 1865, by the party calling him but that witness did not in the event prove to be hostile, the judge still had [...] [read post]
23 Oct 2009, 9:09 am
[See pp. 165-204, on Vásquez.] [read post]
7 Oct 2009, 4:28 am
" Id.Don't sell yourself short, Judge -- it's a teensy bit harsh too.1445 Washington v. [read post]
1 Oct 2009, 4:00 am
Ce principe a de nouveau été confirmé dans l’arrêt Vêtement Multi-Wear Inc. c. [read post]
28 Sep 2009, 9:30 am
There has been an awful lot said about US v. [read post]
22 Sep 2009, 11:32 am
is not binding on the court but often predicts the likely result :Advocate General's Opinion in Joined Cases C-236/08, C-237/08 and C-238/08Google France & Google Inc. v Louis Vuitton Malletier, Google France v Viaticum & Luteciel and Google France v CNRRH, Pierre-Alexis Thonet, Bruno Raboin & Tiger, franchisée Unicis"..Mr. [read post]
16 Sep 2009, 5:13 am
The Court agrees (see Rodriguez v New York City Housing Authority, 304 AD2d 468, 469 [lst Dept 2003]), and also rejects Hand‘s affidavit as wholly inappropriate. [read post]
14 Sep 2009, 10:12 am
On Thursday, in Herbert v. [read post]
6 Sep 2009, 6:40 am
This sense of principle is illustrated by Ronald Dworkin's example of the principle that no one should be allowed to profit from their own wrong, drawn from the case of Riggs v. [read post]
30 Aug 2009, 6:15 pm
(Michael Geist) China China online infringement – future looking brighter for owners (China Hearsay) Europe Swedish Pirate Party polled 7.1% of the vote in recent European elections (1709 Copyright Blog) EC publishes policy document ‘Europeana – Next Steps’ and consultation about the future of the digital library (1709 Copyright Blog) (Intellectual Property Watch) Soundexchange webcast agreement halves royalty rates (Innovationpartners) … [read post]
22 Jul 2009, 1:20 pm
So for my purposes here, it is A.P. v. [read post]
22 Jul 2009, 12:18 am
Assocs., Inc. v. [read post]
5 Jul 2009, 4:08 pm
Supreme Court’s Decision in Exxon Shipping Co. v. [read post]
3 Jul 2009, 1:31 pm
Herbert, 886 F. [read post]
29 Jun 2009, 7:44 am
Who says the Constitution does not enact Herbert Spencer's Social Statics? [read post]
29 Jun 2009, 4:13 am
"* The decision indicates that DOI was investigating the content of Parkhouse's statement at the hearing, alleged to constitute an "inaccurate reading of the Borough President's letter," and quoting from Herbert v Lando, 441 US 153, states that the "spreading false information in and of itself carries no First Amendment credentials … as there is no constitutional value in false statements of… [read post]
26 Jun 2009, 7:56 am
Supreme Court declined to hear the reverse payment case Arkansas Carpenters Health and Welfare Fund, Paper, A.F. of L., et al. v. [read post]
