Search for: "Hodges v. Hodges" Results 661 - 680 of 1,670
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Mar 2015, 3:18 am by Amy Howe
’” At The Economist’s Democracy in America blog, Steven Mazie outlines what he describes as “a plausible scenario” in which the Chief Justice “may vote in the liberal direction in both King v Burwell,the Obamacare case, and Obergefell v Hodges, the same-sex marriage case. [read post]
11 Nov 2021, 7:27 am by Gregory Forman
Hodges, 576 U.S. 644, 675–76 (2015), which held that any state’s restriction on same-sex marriage was void ab initio. [read post]
24 May 2019, 4:18 am by CMS
In this post, Natalie comments on the decision handed down in the matter of Warner v Scapa Flow Charters [2018] UKSC 52: Background Scapa Flow Charters (Scotland) (“SFC”), a dive charter company, own and operate the vessel MV Jean Elaine. [read post]
21 Mar 2018, 3:35 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
Lords Sumption and Lloyd-Jones give the lead judgments, with which Lords Mance, Hodge and Briggs agree. [read post]
8 Sep 2017, 6:30 am by KATIE SCOTT, EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
The Scottish case, McDonald v Newton or McDonald, relates to Mr McDonald, who worked as a miner for British Coal between 11 Dec 1978 and 10 Aug 1985. [read post]
19 Jul 2017, 5:42 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
Hodges that the Constitution makes it illegal for states to prohibit same-sex marriages. [read post]
2 Mar 2014, 9:24 am by Howard Friedman
LEXIS 25030 (SD TX, Feb. 27, 2014), a Texas federal magistrate judge rejected Native American inmates' challenges to the ban on inmates smoking the ceremonial pipe, infrequent Native American religious services, the grooming policy and the ban on medicine bags outside of cells.In Hodges v. [read post]
3 May 2017, 8:09 am by ASAD KHAN
Lady Hale and Lords Wilson, Carnwath, Hodge and Toulson recently heard these appeals and reserved judgment on the issue whether section 94B of the Nationality, Immigration and Asylum Act 2002 complies with the procedural and substantive protections under ECHR, article 8. [read post]