Search for: "House v. State"
Results 661 - 680
of 25,027
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Dec 2013, 2:55 am
A. v Secretary of State for the Home Department. [read post]
5 Dec 2013, 2:55 am
A. v Secretary of State for the Home Department. [read post]
15 Feb 2010, 6:00 pm
Stewart, No. 09-0257 (docket and briefs) (a takings case involving the City’s demolition of a house determined to be a nuisance) and Jefferson State Bank v. [read post]
New Judgment: Sadovska & Anor v Secretary of State for the Home Department (Scotland) [2017] UKSC 54
26 Jul 2017, 2:39 am
To determine the initial criterion, the Supreme Court held that the burden of proof of establishing that the proposed marriage is one of convenience falls on the Secretary of State. [read post]
13 Feb 2009, 5:01 pm
Remember Mike Ritze, the Oklahoma bozo who filed the "Ten Commandments Monument Display Act," in the Oklahoma House of Representatives seeking to have a monument of the Ten Commandments placed on the state Capitol grounds? [read post]
3 Dec 2024, 3:44 am
Yesterday, 2 December, there was a short debate in the House of Lords on a Question tabled by Baroness Thornton (Lab) and asked on the day by Lord Dubs (Lab), asking His Majesty’s Government whether they conducted an equality impact assessment following the judgment in R (Harrison & Ors) v Secretary of State for Justice [2020] concerning humanist marriages. [read post]
5 Oct 2020, 11:33 am
This was an important case, building upon some earlier cases, like United States v. [read post]
29 Sep 2010, 6:11 am
The competition authorities of individual EU Member States will still apply their national rules on LPP, which may recognize communications with in-house counsel as privileged. [read post]
27 Jul 2012, 9:00 pm
United States v. [read post]
9 Aug 2012, 4:04 am
United States v. [read post]
18 Aug 2014, 4:00 am
”So are you rooting for House Pizzi or House Slaton? [read post]
24 Dec 2018, 11:30 am
In Commonwealth v. [read post]
24 Apr 2009, 8:12 am
July 3, 2006)(striking down a non-compete for an in-house attorney and stating that Illinois and other states have done the same). [read post]
9 Mar 2018, 9:38 am
See, e.g., Pratt v. [read post]
20 Jan 2018, 1:51 am
United States v. [read post]
4 Feb 2009, 3:03 am
Z T (Kosovo) (Respondent) v Secretary of State for the Home Department (Appellant) [2009] UKHL 6 (4 February 2009) Holmes-Moorhouse(FC) (Original Respondent and Cross-appellant) v London Borough of Richmond upon Thames (Original Appellants and Cross-respondents) [2009] UKHL 7 (4 February 2009) Marks and Spencer plc (Appellants) v Her Majesty's Commissioners of Customs and Excise (Respondents) [2009] UKHL [...] [read post]
11 Jun 2009, 1:55 am
Secretary of State for the Home Department (Respondent) v AF (Appellant) (FC) and another (Appellant) and one other action [2009] UKHL 28 (10 June 2009) Hanoman (FC) (Respondent) v London Borough of Southwark (Appellants) [2009] UKHL 29 (10 June 2009) R v Islam (Respondent) (on appeal from the Court of Appeal Criminal Division) [2009] UKHL 30 [...] [read post]
Will the Republican Rules Package in the House Make Calling a Constitutional Convention More Likely?
9 Jan 2023, 7:06 am
An ELB reader notes this provision buried in the rules bill, that would potentially revive some old state calls for a constitutional convention: PROVIDING FOR TRANSPARENCY WITH RESPECT TO MEMORIALS SUBMITTED PURSUANT TO ARTICLE V OF THE CONSTITUTION OF THE… Continue reading The post Will the Republican Rules Package in the House Make Calling a Constitutional Convention More Likely? [read post]
31 Jan 2020, 1:08 pm
Both the house and the senate approved HJ Res 208, and by 1972, 22 states had ratified. [read post]
