Search for: "IN RE: JURY ISSUE" Results 661 - 680 of 10,444
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Aug 2018, 2:32 pm
  That way, we can totally ignore the rest of the thing unless we're profoundly interested. [read post]
29 Jun 2018, 9:54 am by Danny O'Brien
As Reda says, do a little research on where your MEP stands on the issues. [read post]
24 Mar 2017, 7:12 am by Thaddeus Hoffmeister
Juror texting is really a new version of an age-old issue aimed at maintaining the sanctity of the impartial juror and the fairness of a jury trial. [read post]
1 Feb 2010, 9:28 am by Steve Hall
A Randall County jury convicted Brewer in 1991 of capital murder and sentenced him to death. [read post]
6 Nov 2009, 7:30 am by Moseley Collins
Reviewing this kind of briefing should help potential plaintiffs and clients better understand how parties in a personal injury case present such issues to the court. [read post]
  And if you’re a citizen of this country—someone who is afforded the right to trial under our Constitution and laws, then you also need to take a stand on this issue. [read post]
12 Jun 2020, 4:14 pm by Benjamin Wittes
Wilkins tries again: What if the district court had issued a minute order saying it would do an “independent investigation” and issue an opinion in due course. [read post]
30 Nov 2023, 4:00 am by Michael C. Dorf
No Justice asked any questions about the nondelegation issue. [read post]
17 Aug 2016, 11:11 am by Florian Mueller
But the Marshmallow Chrome issue is absolutely pivotal, and in case Judge Alsup orders a re-retrial, it will be a whole new ball game and in that case I'll form my opinion on each and every decision before, during and after the re-retrial as if the things that went wrong last time had never happened in the first place. [read post]
24 Mar 2021, 7:47 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
But the Court still finds in plaintiff's favor on another issue, holding that plaintiff's re-sentencing following the abolition of the death penalty in Connecticut was an unconstitutional bill of attainder. [read post]
18 May 2009, 3:34 am
  About the only news — and I’m really plumbing the depths here — is a cert filing in a case out of Washington by the law firm which runs SCOTUSblog and which, they tell us, raises the issue  of “whether the Double Jeopardy Clause prohibits retrial on a charge when the jury is instructed to begin deliberations with the most serious charge but proceed to a less serious charge if it cannot agree, and the jury… [read post]
20 Aug 2007, 8:02 am
LVSun 8/20/07 Week in Review: Clark County (re: Judge Halverson yard issues). [read post]
25 Jul 2008, 10:51 am
E.g., In re Tobacco Litigation, 624 S.E.2d at 740 (W. [read post]
6 Jun 2017, 12:10 pm by Florian Mueller
"Carl Cecere, Attorney for the Hispanic Leadership Fund and the National Grange:"You're asking the jury to evaluate the state of the art in technologies as diverse as biotechnology, space telescopes, and evaluate whether this is a step beyond what was already there. [read post]
25 Sep 2006, 7:22 am by Veronica
In In re General Electric Capital Corp., the Court addressed, in a mandamus proceeding, whether a party who did not receive notice of a jury demand nevertheless waived its contractual right to a non-jury trial by failing to notice that the case had been moved to the jury docket. [read post]