Search for: "IN THE INTEREST OF: R. S. T., A CHILD (MOTHER)" Results 661 - 680 of 1,169
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Mar 2012, 5:14 pm
In other words, the mother's husband is presumptively the child's father. [read post]
22 Mar 2012, 5:05 am by J. Benjamin Stevens
 and co-author of The Complete Single Mother, says that while a divorcee may be experiencing pain and confusion following a divorce, it’s better to go through that then to numb yourself with an instant attempt to date. [read post]
19 Mar 2012, 7:55 am by Lovechilde
Do the generalized threats and half-truths of this Administration give any one of us in Congress the confidence to tell a mother or father or family that the loss of their child or loved one was in the name of a just cause? [read post]
16 Mar 2012, 8:58 am
The child's mother, Victoria Valdez, was only 16-years-old when she tragically died from severe head injuries caused by a car accident on New Year's Day. [read post]
15 Mar 2012, 2:26 pm
However, the 14th District Houston Court of Appeals in In the Interest of R.T.K. made the distinction that in modification proceedings, this parental presumption doesn't exist. [read post]
13 Mar 2012, 10:55 am
A Family Court judge ruled in the father's favor, saying he wasn't required to pay college costs. [read post]
13 Mar 2012, 7:38 am by Allie
I came across an interesting article about a couple that sued their health care professionals for failing to discover that the child had Down syndrome while the mother was pregnant despite numerous tests. [read post]
11 Mar 2012, 3:51 pm
The mother of the child informed police the child had been sleeping at home when she left for work at 4 in the morning. [read post]
8 Mar 2012, 1:11 pm by Eugene Volokh
And on balance, the court concluded, the mother was therefore “in a superior position to assess and meet her childs medical needs,” and should be awarded sole custody for purposes of making medical decisions — even though the court thought the mothers opposition to immunization was against the childs interest: The Court’s sole reservation in finding Mrs. [read post]
8 Mar 2012, 4:40 am
The court explained that the right to sue "adequately protects any property interest that children might have in an action for a parent's wrongful death. [read post]
1 Mar 2012, 9:04 pm by SO Issues
Though interest in [name withheld]'s case tends to focus on his claim of innocence, his attack on the psychological test could influence future attempts to challenge allegedly bad science in the courtroom — a continuing problem that the nation's appellate courts have struggled with for decades. [read post]
29 Feb 2012, 8:35 pm
At about two weeks later, the mother and the mothers boyfriend each charged in connection with Egypt's death. [read post]
29 Feb 2012, 9:07 am by Ken
Actual people's well-being could be threatened by the new (even if healthy) child requiring energy, money and care which the family might happen to be in short supply of. [read post]
27 Feb 2012, 6:24 pm
In addition, the court’s finding that the sentencing guidelines don’t require surrounding conduct to be limited to child pornography conduct, but this is a very loose standard that doesn’t guide district courts on how to apply the sentencing guidelines uniformly and fairly. [read post]
16 Feb 2012, 6:56 pm by Jeralyn
She and her mother were represented by the same attorney, raising issues of conflict of interest. [read post]