Search for: "IN THE MATTER OF THE ENFORCEMENT OF A SUBPOENA."
Results 661 - 680
of 1,956
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Jul 2020, 9:52 am
The AAG directs and supervises the work of all attorneys within the Unit and contract attorneys representing the Navajo Nation on water rights matters. [read post]
1 Jul 2020, 11:13 am
Companies closely monitor enforcement and regulatory trends in their industry. [read post]
1 Jul 2020, 8:51 am
Maury Shenk and I are dubious about the use of competition law for privacy enforcement. [read post]
30 Jun 2020, 2:41 am
Maury Shenk and I are dubious about the use of competition law for privacy enforcement. [read post]
25 Jun 2020, 8:36 am
Originally posted at Just SecurityYesterday morning—in a stunning decision that broke from usual standards of judicial process and self-restraint—D.C. [read post]
5 Jun 2020, 8:17 am
ICYMI: Yesterday on Lawfare Elliot Setzer shared the criminal complaint against three alleged far-right anti-government extremists charged with conspiracy to incite violence at a Las Vegas Black Lives Matter protest. [read post]
5 Jun 2020, 3:00 am
National/Federal As Trump Attacks Voting by Mail, GOP Builds 2020 Strategy Around Limiting Its Expansion MSN – Amy Gardner, Shawn Boberg, and Josh Dawsey (Washington Post) | Published: 6/1/2020 President Trump’s persistent attacks on mail-in voting have fueled an unprecedented effort by conservatives to limit expansion of the practice before the November election, with tens of millions of dollars planned for lawsuits and advertising aimed at restricting who receives ballots and… [read post]
3 Jun 2020, 7:42 am
With all the usual caveats about the dangers of extrapolating from oral arguments, I think it’s likely that the court will overwhelmingly find (as it should) that the House Judiciary Committee has standing to sue McGahn to enforce its subpoena for him to testify, but that the judges will be much more likely to be skeptical of the House’s standing to enjoin expenditure of funds for building the wall in the Mnuchin case, as they should be. [read post]
28 May 2020, 10:51 am
Why It Matters The report really doesn’t say that much. [read post]
27 May 2020, 6:31 am
The election of a new president from a different political party than the incumbent administration, following an extremely unusual predecessor, presents an opportunity for systematic reevaluation of national security matters. [read post]
22 May 2020, 3:00 am
A court decision required Maryland to permanently cease enforcing parts of its online ad disclosure law against newspapers and television stations that have websites selling political ads. [read post]
19 May 2020, 8:28 am
In Collaborative Divorce, court access is not needed for resolution of the type of issues demanded in litigation, such as Temporary Orders Hearings, Temporary Restraining Orders, Injunctions, Discovery Fights/ Motions to Compel, Motions to Enforce, Depositions, Subpoenas, and compliance with strict deadlines in Pre-Trial Scheduling Orders, including those related to dueling experts. [read post]
19 May 2020, 8:28 am
In Collaborative Divorce, court access is not needed for resolution of the type of issues demanded in litigation, such as Temporary Orders Hearings, Temporary Restraining Orders, Injunctions, Discovery Fights/ Motions to Compel, Motions to Enforce, Depositions, Subpoenas, and compliance with strict deadlines in Pre-Trial Scheduling Orders, including those related to dueling experts. [read post]
17 May 2020, 9:30 pm
When civil enforcement proved ineffective, foresters within Interior wanted to criminalize violations of grazing regulations, because they could not convince GLO lawyers that such “administrative crimes” would not be an unconstitutional delegation of legislative power from Congress to the executive branch. [read post]
13 May 2020, 3:34 pm
Maybe Steve Sachs is right, as a matter of first principles. [read post]
13 May 2020, 6:20 am
As a legal matter, the court’s decision could clarify the limits on executive power in the face of congressional oversight. [read post]
12 May 2020, 6:30 pm
Marriage and divorce are matters largely left to state regulation, not federal. [read post]
12 May 2020, 3:58 pm
Asked by Chief Justice Roberts to name a single example of a subpoena that could not satisfy that standard, Letter whiffed. [read post]
12 May 2020, 4:00 am
But Congress may not use subpoenas to engage in law enforcement because law enforcement is an executive function. [read post]
10 May 2020, 9:01 pm
” The appeals court rejected this claim and “after reviewing historical and legal precedent,” concluded that “presidential immunity does not bar the enforcement of a state grand jury subpoena directing a third party to produce non-privileged material, even when the subject matter under investigation pertains to the President. [read post]
