Search for: "INFORRM"
Results 661 - 680
of 882
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Jan 2017, 4:03 pm
As Hugh Tomlinson QC notes on the Inforrm blog, it’s a ‘difficult’ case, ‘which is likely to produce a definitive restatement of the principles which apply when a party is seeking to derogate from the principles of open justice’. [read post]
10 May 2015, 4:19 pm
As argued this week by Brian Cathart for Inforrm, the closing days of the campaign demonstrated editors’ flagrant disregard for the Editor’s Code, which requires that the press “distinguish clearly between comment, conjecture and fact”. [read post]
2 Jun 2017, 2:55 am
In the case of Giesbert v France ([2017] ECHR 504, 1 June 2017)(French only) the Fifth Section of the Court of Human Rights held that Court orders made against the magazine, Le Point, sanctioning the publication of criminal court documents in the high profile “Bettancourt” case did not violate Article 10 of the Convention. [read post]
26 Aug 2023, 4:05 am
Inforrm’s Blog features the article, originally published by The Conversation, that argues “trusted flaggers” can reduce the proliferation of harmful content on social media. [read post]
14 Sep 2021, 4:23 pm
This post is the second part of two posts on the draft Online Safety Bill. [read post]
28 Mar 2018, 4:07 pm
Inforrm have recently commented on the Ministry of Justice’s privacy injunction statistics for 2017 here, where it was reported that there were 2 final privacy injunction proceedings in 2017 and only one that resulted in a final undertaking. [read post]
20 Sep 2015, 5:03 pm
In the case of Brett Wilson LLP v Persons Unknown ([2015] EWHC 2628 (QB))(16 September 2015) Warby J granted a permanent injunction against the unknown operators of the “Solicitors from Hell UK” website. [read post]
16 Jan 2022, 4:22 pm
Inforrm reports here and here. [read post]
20 Apr 2016, 7:12 am
We wrote an Inforrm blog post on the first judgment here. [read post]
19 Sep 2011, 6:06 am
The police may well be justified in seeking the disclosure, on the grounds that they need to plug the holes (see Brian Cathcart on Inforrm’s Blog for a post from their perspective). [read post]
25 Apr 2011, 5:18 pm
The Prime Minister has said that he is “uneasy” about the development of a privacy law by judges based on the European Convention when this should be a matter for parliament. [read post]
28 Mar 2012, 4:09 am
An Inforrm report on the conclusion of the trial (including most of the facts detailed below) can be found here. [read post]
8 Feb 2015, 4:23 pm
Please let Inforrm know: inforrmeditorial@gmail.com. [read post]
14 Dec 2015, 4:09 pm
And what a remarkable history it is – from our humble convict days, to the modern success of being crowned the libel capital of the world by academics (Roy Baker’sThird Person Singular, 17/10/2003) and bloggers (Inforrm, 12/10/2010); and, finally, to the enactment of a uniform code which Dr Rolph tells us is “characterised by haste and compromise”. [read post]
6 Jun 2010, 7:50 am
News The decision of Mr Justice Tugendhat to order trial by judge alone was an Inforrm exclusive and we also were first with the news of the application for permission to appeal. [read post]
25 Mar 2016, 5:16 pm
In the case of Pinto Coelho v Portugal (No.2) ([2016] ECHR 296)(only in French) the Fourth Section of the Court of Human Rights held (by a 6:1 majority) that the imposition of a fine on a journalist who had published unauthorised audio recordings of a criminal trial was a breach of Article 10. [read post]
9 Jul 2012, 4:12 am
Please let Inforrm know: inforrmeditorial@gmail.com. [read post]
19 Sep 2011, 1:22 am
The police may well be justified in seeking the disclosure, on the grounds that they need to plug the holes (see Brian Cathcart on Inforrm’s Blog for a post from their perspective). [read post]
7 Mar 2011, 2:56 am
By way of background, Alex Bailin QC has posted an excellent comment piece on the Inforrm blog. [read post]
7 Feb 2011, 2:30 am
Edward Craven’s Inforrm post about the decision attracted a record number of hits. [read post]
