Search for: "In Interest of Ac"
Results 661 - 680
of 2,349
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Jul 2017, 9:11 am
And I learned a couple of interesting things that I definitely didn't know previously.For one thing, this one involves notice not to an Indian tribe, but to Mexico. [read post]
23 Jul 2017, 5:11 pm
Check out the latest "Reasonably Suspicious" podcast from Just Liberty, hosted by your correspondent and Amanda Marzullo of the Texas Defender Service. [read post]
14 Jul 2017, 2:40 am
The judgment is also interesting in its analysis of the weight to be given to international law when interpreting Convention rights. [read post]
13 Jul 2017, 4:05 pm
Secretary Of State For The Home Department, Ex Parte Fire Brigades Union And Others [1995] 2 AC 513 (‘Fire Brigades Union’) support the proposition that on the true meaning and construction of the CCA ‘Publishers of news-related material: damages and costs’ section 40 should have been brought into force, as have sections 41-42, as the particular day prescribed in the CCA section 40(6) has come to pass. [read post]
12 Jul 2017, 4:15 pm
But he did so on an interesting basis. [read post]
10 Jul 2017, 9:43 am
GWU Law News covered the ACS event, and video is posted online. [read post]
6 Jul 2017, 5:31 pm
I welcome guest post submissions from responsible authors on topics of interest to this site’s readers. [read post]
5 Jul 2017, 8:06 am
The statement also reports that the Bank of England will bring forward the assessment of stressed losses on consumer credit lending in its annual cyclical stress (ACS) test for the major firms. [read post]
5 Jul 2017, 5:33 am
The FlamingosJune was certainly an interesting month in the world of copyright, and below you will find a selection of stories that have caught the eye of our new intern Matthew Lingard in the past month, supplemented by a couple of notes from Ben Challis! [read post]
29 Jun 2017, 4:42 am
Commentary comes from Ira Lupu and Bob Tuttle at ACS blog, David Cortman in an op-ed for the St. [read post]
19 Jun 2017, 12:31 pm
ACS has now made a video of the panel available on Youtube and at the ACS website. [read post]
15 Jun 2017, 6:15 pm
” It’ll be interesting to see ACE, particularly with Internet companies, Amazon and Netflix, pitted against Google/YouTube and other platforms. [read post]
2 Jun 2017, 1:34 pm
(This final provision, which is still in effect, appears in the same section that contains § 1182(f), which allows the President to deny entry to those he finds would be detrimental to American interests). [read post]
10 May 2017, 4:38 am
The meaning of the article was that Mr Pierdant was involved in a corrupt relationship with the President and his family that is/was likely to conflict with his business interests. [read post]
9 May 2017, 4:30 pm
But, by the end of the 1800s, this rationale lost currency, and by 1917 (in Bowman v Secular Society [1917] AC 406), the House of Lords held that blasphemy protected the religious sensitivities of the individual; but the courts still confined the scope of the offence to the established Church (this was confirmed as recently as 1991 in R v Chief Metropolitan Stipendiary Magistrate, ex parte Choudhury [1991] 1 QB 429). [read post]
8 May 2017, 9:06 am
Moreover although a prosecutor retains a discretion under the public interest stage not to prosecute a case which meets the evidential threshold, that discretion will not engage art 8 unless the offence itself violates art 8. [read post]
3 May 2017, 4:15 pm
E/AC.51/2017/10 (UN Economic and Social Council, April 2017) [text via Refworld]- This report "evaluates the role of UNHCR in the registration of refugees and asylum seekers from 2012 to 2016. [read post]
3 May 2017, 8:16 am
The bank holds all the valuable cards: the King, the Ace and of course all the money. [read post]
2 May 2017, 7:58 am
It's still a work-in-progress, but was good to discuss; it's also to some extent Australia-focused but this creates interesting parallels to the U.S.The portion of the title after the colon - "Is the corporate tax really all that bad? [read post]
1 May 2017, 3:41 am
This undoubtedly seemed like a good way to avoid a lot of “business,” because the premise of this classic conundrum is that the exclusive distributor has apparently aced the manufacturer out of goodwill by using the manufacturer’s own mark in commerce before (usually way before) the manufacturer has (if it indeed ever has at all). [read post]
