Search for: "In Re: Little v." Results 661 - 680 of 10,761
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Apr 2011, 11:27 am by Law Office of D. Hardison Wood
” That little wrinkle is what is called the “billed v. paid” or “quoted price v. incurred amount” provision in SB 33. [read post]
20 Nov 2012, 10:04 am
"   Once the prerogative of theconsumer, confusion is nowa matter for the judge ...The Court then cited cases including esure Insurance Ltd v Direct Line [2008] RPC 34, Re GE Trade Mark [1973] RPC 297 and Gut Springenheide GmbH v Oberkreisdirektor des Kreises Steinfurt (Case C-210/96) from which it was clear that the ultimate issue of confusion is one for the judge, rather than witnesses, but that a judge can reach the conclusion in the absence of… [read post]
25 Oct 2023, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
 . and it’s quite clear that they’re not interpreting the law, they’re making the law. [read post]
11 Feb 2010, 4:10 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Actually we're a little shocked at the facts of this matrimonial action involving Thomas Liotti. [read post]
28 Apr 2011, 3:30 pm
Citing decisions such as L'Oréal v Bellure, Trevor observed that concepts like "unfair advantage" and "without due cause" -- which do exist in European statute law -- receive little attention, while terms that have no legal basis such as "parasitism and "riding on the coat-tails" do. [read post]
30 Nov 2009, 3:49 am
 In Baker v. [read post]
1 May 2017, 11:34 am
 A little moral suasion is often a good thing. [read post]
1 Sep 2020, 1:30 pm
[This reads a little one-sided, like it's coming from an advocate's mouth or purely one side's version of what happened, but okay.] [read post]
16 Sep 2010, 8:55 am by Elie Mystal
Find out more here.Earlier: Bed Bugs v. [read post]
28 May 2014, 1:28 pm
 But my smile got a little brighter when I read this introductory paragraph of an opinion by Judge Kozinski:"It is said that every dog has its day. [read post]
19 Mar 2020, 4:36 pm
  But amongst the ways in which the world has changed fairly recently is that, at least as I perceive it, we're starting to get more days like today in the appellate world. [read post]
7 Jun 2016, 1:48 pm
 You're instead required only to produce sufficient evidence from which a trier of fact could conclude that, yep, this stuff more likely than not came from the guy. [read post]
12 Sep 2017, 9:44 am
 At which point the others (wisely) flee.Nor was this a meek little crew. [read post]
24 Nov 2021, 12:09 pm
  Even if you're a judge.I'm agnostic as to whether Judge VanDyke's experiences are more accurate than mine. [read post]
16 Sep 2024, 11:56 am
Instead, on occasion, at least, they're going to join the fight and show the flag. [read post]