Search for: "In Re Goldstein"
Results 661 - 680
of 845
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Jun 2018, 4:29 am
” [Disclosure: Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, is among the counsel to the petitioner in this case.] [read post]
9 May 2011, 10:43 pm
We're not a charitable organization. [read post]
19 Sep 2015, 4:51 am
Whereas ATL goes for biglaw wannabes, the Puddle goes for the readers who are too stupid to know they’re being scammed. [read post]
21 Nov 2007, 2:21 pm
They think this will prevent the President from appointing officers during this intra-session adjournment.I'm not sure why they're so confident. [read post]
4 Dec 2006, 8:16 am
So why did the Supremes re-list this case four times before granting it? [read post]
27 Mar 2018, 7:52 am
[Disclosure: Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, is among the counsel on an amicus brief in support of the respondents in this case. [read post]
4 Jun 2009, 7:53 am
What you're saying is that the department can engage in intentional discrimination to avoid concern that they will be sued under disparate impact. [read post]
22 Jun 2020, 3:52 am
” [Disclosure: Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, is counsel on an amicus brief in support of respondent Stephens in Harris Funeral Homes v. [read post]
20 Jun 2014, 11:53 am
Maryland or California’s arrest of a federal marshal for taking authorized actions to protect the life of a Supreme Court Justice in In re Neagle. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 1:11 pm
Chicago American Manufacturing, LLC, 686 F.3d 372 (7th Cir. 2012) [Disclosure: Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, is among the counsel on an amicus brief in support of the petitioner in this case. [read post]
23 Jun 2015, 7:31 am
Richard Re covered the decision for this blog, with commentary from Noah Feldman at Bloomberg View and Steven Schwinn at the Constitutional Law Prof Blog. [read post]
5 Dec 2007, 5:27 am
Re: your comment "it was a gigantic risk for the VC guys who invested", wasn't BRCA1 a discovery of the University of Utah? [read post]
25 Feb 2020, 4:02 am
[Disclosure: Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, is counsel on an amicus brief in support of the respondents in this case.] [read post]
21 Dec 2015, 3:36 am
In re Carlisle Etcetera LLC, 2015 WL 1947027 [Del. [read post]
3 Dec 2019, 6:22 am
[Disclosure: Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, is counsel for the respondents in this case. [read post]
16 Sep 2013, 9:55 am
Neither of these options requires significant re-evaluation of any Supreme Court precedent. [read post]
Latest Twist in the Flynn Case Highlights the Danger of Judicial Deference to Trump’s Administration
24 Jun 2020, 9:01 pm
In those cases, the “tone,” as Yale law professor Abraham Goldstein once observed, “…has been less one of judicial restraint than of judicial withdrawal. [read post]
3 Mar 2011, 6:54 am
United States In Pepper, the Court held that at re-sentencing a district court may consider evidence of the defendant’s rehabilitation that occurred after the initial sentencing, and that that evidence may support a downward variance from the sentencing guidelines. [read post]
19 Mar 2018, 10:15 am
[Disclosure: Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, is among the counsel on an amicus brief in support of the respondents in this case. [read post]
16 May 2016, 11:35 am
We’re on to the next decision, from Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, in Sheriff v. [read post]
