Search for: "In Re Kerr"
Results 661 - 680
of 1,243
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 May 2017, 1:57 pm
Q And when you’re asking for a ping order, what does that ping — what does a ping mean? [read post]
[Orin Kerr] Byrd v. United States: The Supreme Court Takes a Broad View of Fourth Amendment Standing
15 May 2018, 4:12 am
Perhaps Byrd is another data point for my thesis that we're in an era of expanding Fourth Amendment rights but retreating Fourth Amendment [read post]
29 Sep 2016, 1:38 pm
See In re Search Warrant, 71 A. 3d 1158 (Vt. 2012) (rejecting “any blanket prohibition on ex ante search warrant instructions”); see also In the Matter of a Warrant for All Content & Other Info. [read post]
9 Aug 2017, 3:09 am
Lords Kerr and Wilson gave a joint dissenting judgment. [read post]
28 Nov 2017, 9:07 am
. * * * * * * To: Orin Kerr From: Gus Hurwitz “Net neutrality” refers generally to the idea that ISPs should not treat traffic traversing their networks differently based on its source, content, use, &c. [read post]
28 May 2015, 11:01 am
Maybe they are and maybe they’re not, but certainly the perception is there. [read post]
29 Jul 2024, 1:10 pm
And as it happens, they're not the kinds of cases that tend to get labeled "courageous" anyway. [read post]
3 Apr 2018, 1:02 am
Now you're wondering: How does any of this explain the Supreme Court's interest in reviewing so many qualified immunity cases? [read post]
31 Oct 2019, 4:25 am
There are disagreements on occasion, but they're relatively rare. [read post]
11 Dec 2020, 1:45 am
They did not dissent as they recognised that they were in the minority and the pure happenstance that Lord Kerr died after completion of the judgments, but just before they could be handed down, should not mean that the case has to be re-heard due to an evenly divided panel. [read post]
21 Feb 2007, 8:14 am
Clarke, 1999 ME 141 In Re Kafia M., 1999 ME 195 In Re Kafia M., Part II Links below are to Casemaker (a for fee/membership service) State v. [read post]
30 Oct 2014, 10:46 pm
If you’re looking for evidence showing why the smug consensus is wrong, here is Exhibit A. . . . . [read post]
23 Jan 2015, 5:29 am
And under Whren, the Court allows such steps even if they’re the real reason the officer made the stop. [read post]
20 Oct 2013, 8:18 pm
If you’re interested, go to the conference webpage, which gives instructions on how and where to submit a proposal. [read post]
17 Jan 2016, 10:15 am
See Orin Kerr’s The CFAA reaches the Supreme Court, sort of. [read post]
12 Aug 2011, 11:08 am
George Washington University’s Orin Kerr boldly puts his chips on the table, predicting that the constitutionality of the law will be upheld by at least six justices. [read post]
19 Jul 2017, 3:10 am
The summary given on hand down (given by Lord Sumption) is here: Lords Wilson and Kerr, dissenting, took view that Lord Rodger in In re Guardian News and Media Ltd was stating a legal presumption that courts should act on the basis that most people believe that someone charged with an offence is innocent until proven guilty, but that he had offered no evidence or authority to support such a presumption. [read post]
8 Jul 2008, 12:40 am
Like Orin Kerr at Volokh, I still don't see that this is a big issue because the military has always had its own rules and never has factored into 8th Amendment evolving standards cases. [read post]
2 Jul 2008, 1:31 pm
., the Volokh Conspiracy (Orin Kerr); Wikipedia -- we've been forced to show our hand. [read post]
26 May 2012, 2:01 pm
It’s doubtful you’d suspect the cut of meat you’re eating at dinner was subject to patent. [read post]
