Search for: "In Re Marriage of Will"
Results 661 - 680
of 10,285
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 May 2008, 1:12 pm
decision entitled “In re Marriage Cases” represented a consolidated appeal from 6 cases. [read post]
9 Jun 2011, 3:08 pm
If for whatever reason you’re not completely satisfied with our legal form, we’ll refund your money no questions asked. [read post]
29 Apr 2014, 5:50 pm
Today, there are more options than ever to find someone to help you apply for a Fiance Visa or Marriage Visa. [read post]
2 Apr 2015, 4:10 am
It is the basis of this country," He praised the recent action of the Indiana legislature in enacting its controversial Religious Freedom Restoration Act, saying:We’re seeing in the news right now a lot of noise because the state of Indiana bravely stood up and passed a law defending religious liberty.Criticizing Democrats and gay-rights activists, he added:Because of their partisan desire to mandate gay marriage everywhere in this country, they also want to… [read post]
23 Mar 2009, 6:21 am
The reality is that I have enough difficulty getting USCIS to approve petitions based on marriages that are truly genuine.Anyone thinking of trying to get a green card based on a fake marriage would do well to remember a line from Mickey Rourke's character in the film Body Heat, which I once heard paraphrased by a Boston Immigration Judge: "when you commit a major crime, you got fifty ways you can screw up, and if you can think of 25 of them… [read post]
31 Dec 2010, 10:34 am
In fact, speaking personally, I’ve never needed to go beyond the core case we’re arguing about: any definition of marriage that excludes same-sex couples strikes me as already underinclusive. [read post]
4 Oct 2017, 7:35 am
For example, if you frame the statutory construction issue in this case as an all-or-nothing choice between “void” and “voidable” marriages, the outcome’s inevitable: you’re going to construe F.S. 744.3215(2)(a) as requiring court approval prior to the marriage (otherwise, you’re left opting for a construction of the statute that makes judicial oversight almost impossible). [read post]
16 Apr 2008, 6:10 am
Pursuant to such a ruling, the legislature could quickly re-enact the marriage bill and the governor could sign it, and we would be done with the issue -- unless the ballot measure wins enough valid signatures and we need to go through an initiative battle in the fall. [read post]
27 May 2014, 7:43 pm
Maybe they’re right; women are from Venus, after all. [read post]
22 Nov 2009, 7:58 pm
But instead of changing the law to recognize them, Radnofsky wants to "fix" it to be even clearer that they're the proper targets of discrimination - not, for goodness' sake, Radnofsky and her spouse. [read post]
10 May 2012, 6:23 am
Until yesterday, the failure of the President to express his viewpoint on the topic was beginning to create tension amongst gay right activists.Some view this statement as a possible election strategy: hoping that an express support of gay marriage will bring in the votes to ensure the President’s re-election. [read post]
5 Feb 2019, 10:00 pm
The only solution, if both (still) wish to be married to each other, will be to (re)marry! [read post]
17 Jan 2011, 12:27 pm
The Supreme Court filed this 2-page order Jan. 14, 2010,in In re the Marriage of Bir. [read post]
2 Sep 2022, 12:26 pm
This is when they recognize that they’re more important than the issues that ended your marriage. [read post]
27 Apr 2010, 5:32 am
Sometimes their marriages fall apart while they're living here. [read post]
20 Apr 2011, 10:44 am
Women have been urged to take steps to 'divorce-proof' their business, even if they're still single or in a happy marriage. [read post]
13 Oct 2010, 6:13 pm
Now, in case you’re wondering when you would use a Marriage Contract, let me explain. [read post]
18 Mar 2011, 3:16 pm
Hopefully the main reason is that they're in love and want to be together for the rest of their lives. [read post]
13 May 2011, 6:23 pm
"It's heart-wrenching when you see people who think they are protected and they're not. [read post]
18 Jun 2010, 12:37 pm
We’re attending a panel at the national convention of the American Constitution Society. [read post]
