Search for: "In Re Opinion of the Justices." Results 661 - 680 of 14,245
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Jan 2018, 11:46 am by Ronald Mann
The 2016 opinion did not, however, offer any guidance on the ultimate question of coverage, which is back before the justices again this week. [read post]
6 Jun 2017, 8:06 am by Theresa Gabaldon
First and most obviously, the court’s decision, in an opinion written by Justice Sonia Sotomayor, is going to be an expensive one for the government, which urged the Supreme Court to review the case. [read post]
7 Nov 2008, 3:12 pm
In this week’s order list, the Court did not issue any opinions or grant new petitions for argument. 1 Among other orders, the Court also granted a motion to seal in In re Hon. [read post]
20 Sep 2007, 1:27 am
We're told Kennedy "liked to talk... of great 'teaching cases,' that is, opinions that instructed law students on timeless principles. [read post]
15 Jun 2011, 1:50 pm by Danny Jacobs
The final batch of opinions might include a 5-4 decision decided by the “swing” vote of Justice Anthony M. [read post]
6 Apr 2022, 2:16 pm
Especially when you're not even doing an explanation of the case and are simply saying "Yeah, we're not citing that case".After all, the opinion doesn't rely on a ton of cases: Miranda, Marbury, Dred Scott, etc. [read post]
12 Jun 2008, 4:36 pm
David, you're right: Kennedy's opinion in Boumediene calls Congress out. [read post]
18 Jul 2019, 8:32 am
 He wrote the opinion for the Court in the first case I argued, Chisom v. [read post]
29 Mar 2012, 1:19 pm
" I liked Justice Richman's use of the phrase "ultra-lenient. [read post]
9 Sep 2009, 11:50 am
 (If you're a dilettante, his breezy opinions make easy - and fun! [read post]
18 May 2011, 12:07 pm by David Lat
I think there is a disease of illiteracy or laziness, because just the commentary will tell you they haven’t read [the opinions they're critiquing]….You don’t go to a Georgia fan to get commentary on the University of Florida, because it’s not objective commentary. [read post]