Search for: "In Re Presentment to Superior Court" Results 661 - 680 of 2,213
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 May 2019, 2:00 pm by Vercammen Law
Of these, 1.2 qualify as hours of credit for ethics/professionalism.
           Presented in cooperation with the NJSBA Elder & Disability Law Section and NJSBA Young Lawyers Division [read post]
16 May 2011, 3:14 am by Sean Wajert
Apr. 21, 2010); In re General Motors Corp. [read post]
30 Dec 2014, 9:24 am by Aaron Weems
The Superior Court was unable to re-weigh the evidence and had to accept the trial court’s decision as to the credibility of witnesses. [read post]
19 Jul 2021, 7:43 pm by Shea Denning
See In re Clontz, 376 N.C. 128 (2020) (ordering that district court judge be publicly reprimanded for holding a probable cause hearing without defendant’s court-appointed counsel present in order to “make a point” to defense counsel and other attorneys about being on time in court); In re Murphy, 376 N.C. 219 (2020) (ordering that court of appeals judge be censured for contributing to and enabling a toxic work… [read post]
31 Jul 2011, 8:54 am
The evidence regarding individual negligence, and the manner in which that evidence is presented, is very important to both trial court and appellate court proceedings. [read post]
7 Jul 2010, 9:36 pm
In re Klesper, 397 F.2d 882, 885-86 (CCPA 1968). [read post]
17 Jul 2020, 8:32 am by Dennis Crouch
  Further, there is no presentation of “any judicial usurpation of power or clear abuse of discretion” that might require action by a superior court. [read post]
25 Dec 2013, 3:04 pm by Eugene Volokh
(Eugene Volokh) An interesting case, In re Stephen O. [read post]
4 Mar 2013, 4:00 am by Administrator
Entertainment & Media Law Signal Manson v John Doe – Damages for Anonymous Online DefamationThe recent decision of the Ontario Superior Court of Justice in Manson v John Doe (2013 ONSC 628) offers an opportunity to reflect on both the procedures and outcomes of pursuing court actions for anonymous online defamation. [read post]
19 Jan 2011, 9:38 am by Kent Scheidegger
  The claim that the defendant presents to the federal court may be significantly different from the one he presented to the state court. [read post]
23 Jan 2011, 10:44 pm by Barry Barnett
(In re Lorazepam & Clorazapate Antitrust Litig.), No. 08-5044 (D.C. [read post]
14 Apr 2008, 12:43 pm
The Defendants here certainly are free to present evidence and argue to the ultimate fact-finder that they did nothing negligent to cause the fire, and the fact-finder would be entitled to accept such an argument. * * * The trial court properly concluded that Konnie could invoke res ipsa loquitur against the Defendants and, therefore, properly denied the Defendants' motion for summary judgment. [read post]
13 Jun 2013, 6:28 pm by Stephen Bilkis
Although rare, refusal by a lower court or individual judge to apply seemingly binding superior precedent is not unique. [read post]
26 Feb 2015, 5:00 am
  To these Supreme Court cases, we append the more recent Superior Court case of Makripodis v. [read post]
24 Jan 2013, 4:00 am by Administrator
Each Thursday we present a significant excerpt from a recently published book or journal article. [read post]