Search for: "In The Matter Of: Dunn"
Results 661 - 680
of 1,133
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 May 2013, 9:01 pm
They described how, today, administrative agencies “as a practical matter . . . exercise legislative power, . . . executive power . . . and judicial power. . . [read post]
9 May 2013, 9:01 pm
The “Ecclesiastical Matters” Rule Barring Judicial Resolution Let us first consider the Kentucky court’s decision that it could not weigh in on Kant’s contract claims because to do so would impermissibly draw it into resolving ecclesiastical matters. [read post]
9 May 2013, 4:00 am
I recently met PJ Dunn when he visited my office. [read post]
25 Apr 2013, 9:01 pm
(It is on this crucial question of assent to agency where, as I explain in longer academic writings, I part company with thoughtful commentators, like Ed Whelan, who have argued that as long as the California Supreme Court today thinks that under the California constitution the sponsors are the People’s representatives, it does not matter whether voters, when they enacted Proposition 8 in 2008, could have anticipated this principle of California law, which was not made clear… [read post]
22 Apr 2013, 1:45 pm
Using the above examples of what NOT to do and why it matters may help in that regard. [read post]
17 Apr 2013, 9:01 pm
Michael D’Antonio, Mortal Sins: Sex, Crime, and the Era of Catholic Scandal (Thomas Dunne Books 2013) Ray Mouton, In God’s House: A Novel About One of the Great Scandals of Our Time (Head of Zeus 2012) No matter how hard they try—and they have given it all they have—the Roman Catholic Church hierarchy cannot keep the truth of its callous and calculated disregard of children from reaching the mainstream media and seeping into our common culture. [read post]
10 Apr 2013, 9:01 pm
Why it Matters Whether a Default Judgment is Appropriate If the named plaintiffs should get their licenses either way, a reader might ask, why does it matter whether we go the default judgment route, rather than simply leaving Judge Walker’s order in place? [read post]
28 Mar 2013, 9:01 pm
Supreme Court has recognized, rulings that tolerate but do not affirmatively discuss and affirm a court’s jurisdiction over a matter are not entitled to any precedential weight. [read post]
14 Mar 2013, 9:01 pm
Now that the 2012 election is in the rear-view mirror and the 2016 election is still somewhat distant on the horizon, this is an appropriate time to return to the question of presidential election reform. [read post]
1 Mar 2013, 5:41 am
Dietz will not be addressing any matters that can fairly be described as `commonplace experience[s]. [read post]
1 Mar 2013, 4:51 am
THE GREAT REMOTE WORKER DEBATE: The Only Two Things That Matter… — from The HR Capitalist, Kris Dunn Yahoo is making a Mistake Using Telework as the Scapegoat — from Mike Haberman’s Omega HR Solutions Marissa Mayer Is No Fool — from Harvard Business Review Get Real: Working From Home Does Not Destroy Productivity — from Evil HR Lady, Suzanne Lucas Yahoo! [read post]
1 Mar 2013, 4:51 am
THE GREAT REMOTE WORKER DEBATE: The Only Two Things That Matter… — from The HR Capitalist, Kris Dunn Yahoo is making a Mistake Using Telework as the Scapegoat — from Mike Haberman’s Omega HR Solutions Marissa Mayer Is No Fool — from Harvard Business Review Get Real: Working From Home Does Not Destroy Productivity — from Evil HR Lady, Suzanne Lucas Yahoo! [read post]
28 Feb 2013, 9:01 pm
The Supreme Court this week handed down its first (but almost certainly not its last) 5-4 ruling of the Term. [read post]
26 Feb 2013, 8:25 am
(See Dunn v. [read post]
21 Feb 2013, 9:37 am
Cybersecurity isn’t just a matter of federal concern. [read post]
21 Feb 2013, 6:10 am
The undersigned firms recommend that counsel be consulted with respect to matters addressed in this report. [read post]
21 Feb 2013, 4:00 am
In fact, some claim that we have yet to see anything close to “armed attack” in the cyber “domain” (Dunn Cavelty, 2011; Dunn Cavelty and Rolofs, 2011; Lewis, 2009a, 2010). [read post]
13 Feb 2013, 9:01 pm
The second distinction—the need for both Houses of Congress, and not just one, to be involved before legislative standing is allowed—does draw support from the facts of Chadha (and those of Karcher, for that matter, where the leaders of both chambers of the New Jersey legislature intervened to defend), and also from the fact that Article I of the U.S. [read post]
31 Jan 2013, 9:01 pm
In my column today, I explore what might be learned from the decision by the House of Representatives last week and the seemingly imminent (as of this writing) decision of the Senate this week to pass a bill that seems on its face to directly violate the clear text of the Constitution. [read post]
24 Jan 2013, 1:13 am
Mr L argued firstly that the judge below had failed to apply the test in Kennealy v Dunne [1977] 1 QBD 837 properly.The court is required to be satisfied that the premises are reasonably required, but on the authority of Kennealy v Dunne that reasonable requirement must be something more than a desire but less than a necessity. [read post]
