Search for: "In re: PROCEEDINGS REGARDING CONDUCT OF COUNSEL"
Results 661 - 680
of 1,458
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Jun 2012, 1:33 pm
We note that the Commission is currently conducting an EIS regarding the environmental impacts of SNF [spent nuclear fuel] storage beyond the sixty-year post-license period at issue in this case, and some or all of the problems here may be addressed in such a rulemaking. [read post]
8 Jun 2012, 1:22 pm
We note that the Commission is currently conducting an EIS regarding the environmental impacts of SNF [spent nuclear fuel] storage beyond the sixty-year post-license period at issue in this case, and some or all of the problems here may be addressed in such a rulemaking. [read post]
22 May 2011, 4:34 am
AIR 1981 Raj. 211, and in re: Dr. [read post]
2 Jan 2008, 12:03 pm
Jacob J. stated, …at the commencement of trial, defendant’s counsel, Mr. [read post]
3 May 2016, 9:01 pm
And although states frequently devote woefully inadequate resources to state-appointed counsel to conduct factual investigations, where resources are adequate, such investigation can take time. [read post]
8 Feb 2011, 11:16 am
Morris to forfeit most of his rights from the start of the proceedings. [read post]
26 Apr 2019, 11:20 am
White House counsel Pat Cipollone, in his March 4 letter to Cummings regarding the committee’s inquiry into the White House’s handling of security clearances, relied on the same case to argue that because Congress derives its oversight authority from its legislative powers, the White House m [read post]
16 Aug 2009, 9:51 pm
The AmeriKat's favourite portion of the proceedings was when Judge Davis asked counsel to approach the bench warning Microsoft's counsel: "I don't want to embarrass you in front of the jury, but I would appreciate it if you would clean that up... [read post]
20 May 2010, 11:18 am
It should come as no surprise to most human resource professionals and in-house counsel that California utilizes a different test for determining the “white collar” exemptions (executive, professional and administrative) than is utilized under the FLSA. [read post]
7 May 2020, 10:25 am
Superior court judge’s order directing the State to disclose contents of criminal investigative file in any criminal matter in which the State intends to call a specified law enforcement officer as a witness was an improper advisory opinion that exceeded the scope of the judge’s power In re Washington County Sheriff’s Office, ___ N.C. [read post]
28 Apr 2010, 6:12 am
Editor’s Note: Charles Nathan is Of Counsel at Latham & Watkins LLP and is co-chair of the firm’s Corporate Governance Task Force. [read post]
13 May 2023, 10:46 am
If you are hurt, bring it up during the divorce proceedings…or never again. [read post]
27 Jul 2011, 11:59 am
(c) Even if it is held that specific averments are necessary, whether in the absence of such averments the signatory of the cheque and or the managing directors or joint managing director who admittedly would be in charge of the company and responsible to the company for conduct of its business could be proceeded against. [read post]
4 Oct 2019, 2:35 pm
Under such circumstances, there was no showing of acceptance by conduct as an alternative to acceptance by signature. [read post]
28 Nov 2011, 9:02 am
"The reports of same-sex marriage ceremonies carried out within the Episcopal Church (USA), such as those conducted by Bishop Thomas Shaw of the Diocese of Massachusetts, and by clergy at All Saints Church (Pasadena) in the Diocese of Los Angeles with the approval of Bishop J. [read post]
21 Nov 2019, 8:53 am
In re A.L.C., 607 Fed. [read post]
12 Jan 2022, 8:16 am
" Plaintiff argues that forcing the disclosure of her identity subjects her to re-victimization. [read post]
26 Jan 2011, 8:35 am
Although case law also applies the crime-fraud exception to `other wrongful conduct,’ such conduct must usually be of a criminal or dubious nature, not merely mean or dishonorable. [read post]
14 May 2018, 3:00 am
Res. 59-Authorization for the Use of Military Force of 2018. [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 3:36 pm
(And the fact that Trump’s counsel Jonathan Mitchell doesn’t make any effort to defend this argument should tell you something about its prospects.) [read post]
