Search for: "In re 2012 Legislative Districting of the State" Results 661 - 680 of 833
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Dec 2011, 12:01 am by Robert Thomas (inversecondemnation.com)
The four counties are allowed to zone the land within the "urban" and "agricultural" districts into the more familiar Euclidean zones that we're familiar with). [read post]
19 Feb 2014, 6:28 am
Pollard (2012) case, where the Supreme Court limited the civil-rights actions called Bivens actions — for prisoners in federal private prisons. [read post]
24 Nov 2023, 7:38 am by CMS
On 21 January 2021, the Tverskoy District Court of Moscow ordered seizure of the Belgrave Square Property. [read post]
3 Dec 2018, 8:46 pm by Dennis Crouch
Stoll, Maintaining Post-Grant Review Estoppel in the America Invents Act: A Call for Legislative Restraint, 2012 Patently-O Patent Law Journal 1 (Stoll.2012.estoppel.pdf) Paul Morgan, The Ambiguity in Section 102(a)(1) of the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act, 2011 Patently-O Patent Law Journal 29. [read post]
2 Nov 2020, 11:19 am by Jason Rantanen
Stoll, Maintaining Post-Grant Review Estoppel in the America Invents Act: A Call for Legislative Restraint, 2012 Patently-O Patent Law Journal 1 (Stoll.2012.estoppel.pdf) Paul Morgan, The Ambiguity in Section 102(a)(1) of the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act, 2011 Patently-O Patent Law Journal 29. [read post]
22 Apr 2019, 2:02 pm by Jason Rantanen
Stoll, Maintaining Post-Grant Review Estoppel in the America Invents Act: A Call for Legislative Restraint, 2012 Patently-O Patent Law Journal 1 (Stoll.2012.estoppel.pdf) Paul Morgan, The Ambiguity in Section 102(a)(1) of the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act, 2011 Patently-O Patent Law Journal 29. [read post]
21 Dec 2017, 6:34 am by Dennis Crouch
Stoll, Maintaining Post-Grant Review Estoppel in the America Invents Act: A Call for Legislative Restraint, 2012 Patently-O Patent Law Journal 1 (Stoll.2012.estoppel.pdf) Paul Morgan, The Ambiguity in Section 102(a)(1) of the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act, 2011 Patently-O Patent Law Journal 29. [read post]
22 Apr 2019, 2:02 pm by Jason Rantanen
Stoll, Maintaining Post-Grant Review Estoppel in the America Invents Act: A Call for Legislative Restraint, 2012 Patently-O Patent Law Journal 1 (Stoll.2012.estoppel.pdf) Paul Morgan, The Ambiguity in Section 102(a)(1) of the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act, 2011 Patently-O Patent Law Journal 29. [read post]
26 Nov 2018, 11:46 am by Anushka Limaye
Position oversees and has direct line authority over all Attorney-Advisor positions, Program Analysts, the Public/Legislative Affairs Officer, and any other mission staff. [read post]
3 Dec 2018, 11:13 am by Anushka Limaye
Spencer, discussing the state of the Marines and the Navy, and innovation in the naval domain. [read post]
14 Aug 2019, 12:18 pm by Searcy Law
As of 2015, 34 states plus the District of Columbia have primary seat belt laws. [read post]
14 Aug 2019, 12:18 pm by Searcy Law
As of 2015, 34 states plus the District of Columbia have primary seat belt laws. [read post]
3 Jun 2019, 4:54 am by MBettman
In March 2012, Ayers filed a civil complaint in federal district court against Detective Michael Cipo, Detective Denise Kovach, and the City of Cleveland (“the City”) for violating his civil rights in the underlying criminal case. [read post]
5 Nov 2018, 9:25 am by Anushka Limaye
Position oversees and has direct line authority over all Attorney-Advisor positions, Program Analysts, the Public/Legislative Affairs Officer, and any other mission staff. [read post]
31 Dec 2013, 8:38 am by Angelo A. Paparelli
  Just as in years past (2010, 2011 and 2012), the rules are the same:  There are no rules. [read post]
30 Jul 2020, 11:01 pm by Michael Froomkin
Vereen then ran in 2012 for State Attorney against Katherine Fernandez Rundle, losing 60%-40%. [read post]
16 Feb 2012, 8:54 am by Lovechilde
Consider this a rare show of people power in 2012. [read post]
10 Apr 2018, 1:05 pm by Kelly Hensley and Brian Fong
Recognizing that denial of Fresno County’s motion for summary judgment was tantamount to deciding liability in Plaintiff’s favor, the district court certified its denial for interlocutory appeal. [read post]