Search for: "In re April B." Results 661 - 680 of 3,285
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 May 2007, 5:00 pm
Weissbrodt's Memorandum Decision on Creditor's Amended Objection to Confirmation, In re Swan, Bankruptcy Case No. 06-50708-ASW (Bankr.N.C.Cal., April 18, 2007). [read post]
2 Aug 2012, 1:12 pm by NL
Mr B did not pay £20,000 by 16 April. [read post]
2 Aug 2012, 1:12 pm by NL
Mr B did not pay £20,000 by 16 April. [read post]
1 May 2015, 6:28 pm
Snipes, Re-flagged Kuwait Tankers: The Ultimate Flag of Convenience for an Overall Policy of Neutrality (graduate thesis, Judge Advocate General’s School, April 1988), pages 24-27. [read post]
8 Apr 2010, 8:53 pm by Mark Bennett
Now, I’m not “in the ethics field” except in the sense that a) we’re all (humans, lawyers, criminal defense lawyers) in that field and b) I like wrestling with problems of ethics. [read post]
18 Jun 2012, 3:13 pm by Joel R. Brandes
On April 30, 2012, and May 1, 2012, the parties appeared before the Court for an evidentiary hearing. [read post]
31 Dec 2010, 9:45 am by Paul Karlsgodt
  (See CAB entry dated April 8) April 7 – In American Honda Motor Co. v. [read post]
5 Nov 2021, 3:40 am
In re Snap Inc., Serial Nos. 87177292 and 87211997 (November 3, 2021) [not precedential] (Opinion by Judge Michael B. [read post]
24 May 2023, 11:45 am by Unknown
, Policy Memo, no. 1 (Arab Renaissance for Democracy and Development, Sept. 2022) [text via ReliefWeb]- Focuses on Jordan.Palestinian Christians: The Forcible Displacement and Dispossession Continues (BADIL, May 2023) [text]"Re-(B)ordering: The Impact of the European Union’s Externalisation of Migration on the Human Rights of Migrants in Libya," Journal of Modern Slavery, vol. 8, no. 1 (2023) [full-text]Refugee Communities Mobilising in the Middle East:… [read post]
9 May 2013, 3:20 am
The latest issue of the Revue trimestrielle des droits de l'homme (No. 94, April 2013) is out. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 6:16 pm by FHH Law
 If you’re a bit fuzzy on it all, check out our archive of reports here. [read post]
25 Apr 2013, 3:26 am by John L. Welch
The Examining Attorney should have asked for more information, under Rule 2.61(b), according to Judge Bucher. [read post]