Search for: "In re CHAMBERS"
Results 661 - 680
of 5,468
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Jun 2008, 10:39 pm
Care of one of my students, I was treated to this delight in In re Richard Willis King, 2006 WL 581256 (Bkrtcy. [read post]
3 Nov 2006, 4:44 am
Re-1J, 464 F.3d 1182 (10th Cir. [read post]
27 Jan 2010, 7:55 pm
The following is re-posted from “On Top Magazine“: Pennsylvania Lawmakers To Mull Gay Marriage Ban By Carlos Santoscoy Published: January 27, 2010 Pennsylvania state Senator John H. [read post]
25 May 2011, 8:50 am
Theeyyyyy’re heeeeere! [read post]
10 Oct 2019, 3:00 am
55) Bob Grant56) Alan Shephard57) Bob Gibson58) Georgy Malenkov59) Whittaker Chambers- you won;t find this answer in a pumpkin patch.60) Joseph N. [read post]
8 Nov 2012, 6:23 am
Senate, gaining two seats to slightly cushion their advantage in the chamber. [read post]
21 Jul 2022, 10:45 am
One of the things you have to deal with sometimes when you're on a Ninth Circuit panel is an opinion written by a different judge that reaches what you believe is the right result but in a manner that's quite a bit different than how you'd go about things were your chambers to have written the opinion. [read post]
13 Nov 2008, 10:40 am
Mich-Onyibe v Wandsworth LBC (04/11/08, CA, judgment currently unavailable otherwise than by way of e-flash from Arden Chambers) is a kind of a curious footnote to homelessness law. [read post]
28 Jun 2022, 5:02 am
Chambers deftly explores what it means to be human, to be alien, to relate to others both like you and most assuredly not. [read post]
12 Jun 2014, 5:00 am
We’re happy to offer our idea free of charge to any pro-defense organization, such as the Chamber of Commerce or the American Tort Reform Association, that does engage in tort-related lobbying in Congress.We wish that such a statute were not necessary, but the unfortunate fact remains that, despite decisions by the Supreme Court and by all twelve federal courts of appeals (see here) that decide diversity matters, the existing Erie principle that courts should not… [read post]
26 Apr 2019, 9:30 pm
Legal historians: they're quite the catch! [read post]
13 Nov 2018, 7:38 am
And we're seeing a lot of activity lately in the group self-funded space. [read post]
13 Jul 2013, 8:57 am
Today at IPWatchdog, we’re taking a closer look at some recent innovations to barbecue cooking. [read post]
9 Nov 2012, 12:58 pm
JUROR SHEETS: No, sir.DEFENSE COUNSEL: You're done? [read post]
1 Mar 2018, 3:25 pm
Contents include: Kai Ambos, European Criminal Law and Brexit David Baragwanath, Energising the Law’s Response to Terrorism: The Decision of the Appeals Chamber of the Special Tribunal of Lebanon and the Need for Further Action Martin Böse, The Transnational Dimension of the ne bis in idem Principle and the Notion of res iudicata in the European Union Michael Bohlander, “The Global Panopticon”: Mass Surveillance and Data Privacy Intrusion as a Crime… [read post]
2 Mar 2015, 9:30 pm
Sorry that we're a bit late on this one, but better later than never! [read post]
23 Oct 2017, 1:42 pm
Chambers Courthouse. [read post]
14 Jun 2023, 3:29 am
Comment Streatham Cemetery is currently accepting burials “in a beautiful open area with abundant wildlife and a rich local history” and offers a number of options for memorials: including burial chambers, mausolea, columbaria. [read post]
30 Jul 2019, 3:54 am
Mark Greaves, a barrister at Matrix Chambers, comments on the decision in Tillman (Respondent) v Egon Zehnder Ltd (Appellant) [2019] UKSC 32 which was handed down on 3 July 2019. [read post]
1 Apr 2010, 6:19 pm
But seriously, we're sure a good time was had by all. [read post]
