Search for: "In the Matter of the Child of: J. S., Parent."
Results 661 - 680
of 1,111
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 May 2013, 4:38 am
It then explained that in denying Morgan’s request to give the standard entrapment instruction, the trial judge effectively ruled that entrapment was not an available defense as a matter of law. [read post]
1 May 2013, 6:38 am
Whether the respondent has threatened to conceal, kidnap, or harm the petitioner’s child or children. [read post]
29 Apr 2013, 11:53 am
Indeed, it is strongly presumed that a fit parent’s decisions are in the child’s best interests. [read post]
27 Apr 2013, 5:02 pm
The genesis of this averment, notes McCloskey J, was not specified. [read post]
15 Apr 2013, 9:01 pm
One hard question in lesbian co-parent disputes is whether to characterize them as parent (biological mother) versus non-parent (mother’s partner and child’s functional co-parent), or as parent versus parent. [read post]
11 Apr 2013, 3:33 pm
See Department of Justice Order 1200.1, Chapter 4-1, B.7.j, found at http://www.justice.gov/jmd/ps/chpt4-1.html (last accessed on March 30, 2012). [read post]
3 Apr 2013, 9:06 am
The Programme Thursday 12th September 2013 9.00 – 9.30 Registration 9.30 – 10.00 Welcome session (J. [read post]
1 Apr 2013, 9:01 pm
The New Arkansas Law On February 26, 2013, the Arkansas legislature overrode the governor’s veto to pass An Act to Create the Pain-Capable Unborn Child Protection Act. [read post]
29 Mar 2013, 4:09 pm
You cannot snatch forcibly remove a baby from the care of his parents in this country without a court order, except in very limited circumstances and then only for a matter of hours in case of emergency. [read post]
20 Mar 2013, 12:16 pm
In this matter, the threshold inquiry is whether deceased infant is an "abused child." [read post]
19 Mar 2013, 11:38 am
“When parents make choices in the way they construct their wills and plan for their estates that leave one child or more than one child feeling out of the favoured circle, it’s just a prescription for this stuff to go on and on and on. [read post]
25 Feb 2013, 6:37 pm
This is not a case in which the parties are uncertain whether the FAA applies—they have expressed agreement on that matter.[2] And the underlying case was filed in December 2011, more than two years after section 51.016's effective date. [read post]
25 Feb 2013, 6:37 pm
This is not a case in which the parties are uncertain whether the FAA applies—they have expressed agreement on that matter.[2] And the underlying case was filed in December 2011, more than two years after section 51.016's effective date. [read post]
10 Feb 2013, 2:58 pm
The finding in Mr Gorry’s case might be particularly relevant here. [read post]
10 Feb 2013, 2:58 pm
The finding in Mr Gorry’s case might be particularly relevant here. [read post]
4 Feb 2013, 9:01 pm
If that grandparent had two children, one of whom died before he did, and four grandchildren (two from each child), the estate would be split between the living child (one-half) and the two children of the dead child (one-half to share). [read post]
1 Feb 2013, 5:36 pm
J. [read post]
10 Jan 2013, 3:05 pm
J. [read post]
21 Dec 2012, 9:00 am
Posted by William J. [read post]
19 Dec 2012, 12:31 am
The parent’s address was given. [read post]
