Search for: "Jane Does 1 - 2"
Results 661 - 680
of 1,018
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Jun 2013, 12:28 pm
The suit has also named several Jane Does as defendants, a legal tactic commonly used as a placeholder when the identities of defendants are unknown. [read post]
6 Jun 2013, 6:16 am
Table of Contents Section 1: Use of Fictitious Names or Pseudonyms in Connecticut Courts Table 1: John or Jane Doe Defendants in Civil Matters Table 2: John or Jane Doe Defendants in Summary Process Matters Section 2: Use of Fictitious Business Names in Connecticut Table 3: Use of Fictitious Business Names Section 3: Criminal Impersonation in Connecticut Published: 6/6/2013 9:20 AM [read post]
27 May 2013, 6:20 am
Free speech rights aside, professional women . . . do not need the [Jane Does] of the planet eroding their hard earned respect in the marketplace. [read post]
24 May 2013, 6:20 pm
In my discussions elsewhere about the PGP demonstrations, some have suggested that re-identification requires little or no ethical justification where (1) participants have been warned about the risk of re-identification; (2) participants have given blanket consent to all research uses of the data they make publicly available; and/or (3) the re-identification researchers are scholars rather than commercial or criminal actors. [read post]
19 May 2013, 10:05 pm
The video is worth checking out: Vaknin seems to be most concerned with the speed of the results, but since at most we are talking about the difference between 1 second and 2 seconds, I don't see speed as a major difference. [read post]
4 May 2013, 12:06 pm
Jane Bambauer, Is Data Speech? [read post]
1 May 2013, 1:36 pm
Doe 1 moved the trial court to (1) quash a subpoena that Cooley obtained in California seeking his identity, and (2) issue a protective order. [read post]
1 May 2013, 9:00 am
Here are two additional thoughts provoked by the book: 1. [read post]
29 Apr 2013, 9:36 am
There were also several resolved complaints, including: Mr Charles Tubbs v Daily Mail, No clause specified, 29/04/2013; Dr John Little v The Daily Telegraph, Clause 1, 26/04/2013; Mrs Deborah Farrell v That’s Life, Clause 1, 25/04/2012; Jessica Westwood v The Mail on Sunday, Clause 1, 25/04/2013; Neil Turner v The Daily Telegraph, Clause 1, 25/04/2013; Ms Judy Gibbons v Daily Mail, Clause 1, 25/04/2013; A woman v Daily Mail, Clause 1,… [read post]
25 Apr 2013, 10:12 am
CSX Transportation, Doe-3 v. [read post]
18 Apr 2013, 5:39 am
The Copyright Act defines performing a work publicly in the following manner: (1) to perform6 … it at a place open to the public or at any place where a substantial number of persons outside of a normal circle of a family and its social acquaintances is gathered; or (2) to transmit7 or otherwise communicate a performance … of the work to a place specified by clause (1) or to the public, by means of any device or process, whether the… [read post]
8 Apr 2013, 10:31 am
Defendant John Doe 1, who operated a website about the law school, sought a protective order and moved to quash the subpoena to his Internet service provider. [read post]
8 Mar 2013, 10:11 am
§ 1693a(2). 2. [read post]
4 Mar 2013, 10:53 am
Jane Doe, a taxpayer, expected to report 2014 income equal to 300 percent of the federal poverty level in March 2015, the IRS would use Jane Doe's income projection to make APTC tax credits available to Jane Doe in 2014, to help her pay for health coverage in 2014." [read post]
26 Feb 2013, 8:30 am
Pertinent to this case, a party may appeal (1) an order refusing to stay litigation pending arbitration of its subject matter, (2) denial of a petition to order arbitration, and (3) an order denying an application to compel arbitration. [read post]
26 Feb 2013, 8:30 am
Pertinent to this case, a party may appeal (1) an order refusing to stay litigation pending arbitration of its subject matter, (2) denial of a petition to order arbitration, and (3) an order denying an application to compel arbitration. [read post]
19 Feb 2013, 9:01 pm
(As noted above, the factors are whether the federal issue is (1) necessarily raised, (2) actually disputed, (3) substantial, and (4) whether federal court jurisdiction will disturb the balance of federal and state judicial responsibilities.) [read post]
13 Feb 2013, 3:34 am
Somewhat more radically, if one agrees law does not have a nature, but a culture, then one must account for how the culture of law changes, and has changed, over time. [read post]
7 Feb 2013, 10:49 am
In the Spycatcher case (Attorney-General v Guardian Newspapers Ltd (No. 2) [1990] 1 AC 109) and later in Attorney-General v Blake [1997] Ch 84 it was suggested that the Crown might have a constructive trust over the copyright in the two spys' books. [read post]
1 Feb 2013, 1:55 pm
In an opinion written by Circuit Judge Jane B. [read post]
