Search for: "John D Rogers"
Results 661 - 680
of 888
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Dec 2022, 4:18 am
Eileen Sullivan and Michael D. [read post]
4 Nov 2007, 12:50 pm
One wonders why Koenig did not consult someone closer to the management of the FTCA program like Roger D. [read post]
9 Jun 2008, 3:01 am
Fred Berlin, founder of the Sexual Disorders Clinic at Johns Hopkins University and a critic of civilly committing sex offenders. [read post]
4 Jan 2010, 3:23 am
Vendio Servs., Inc (GRAY on Claims) ITC issues final determination of no section 337 violation in matter based on complaint of Tessera concerning importation and sale of semiconductor chips (ITC 337 Law Blog) ITC issues public version of opinion finding section 337 violation in certain laser imageable lithographic printing plates investigation commenced in response to complaint by Presstek (ITC 337 Law Blog) US Patents – Lawsuits and strategic steps Lincoln Electric Company - ALJ… [read post]
14 Dec 2009, 5:14 am
Things Remembered (Patently-O) US Copyright – Decisions Ninth Circuit rules that Bratz maker MGA Entertainment can continue selling its dolls despite having lost copyright infringement suit last year: MGA Entertainment v Mattel (IPKat) US Copyright – Lawsuits and strategic steps Beyonce - Destiny’s Child and Beyonce settle Cater 2 U copyright dispute: Allen v Destiny’s Child (Chicago IP Litigation Blog) (Chicago IP Litigation Blog) US Trade Marks… [read post]
8 Aug 2011, 8:36 am
Hoelle, John C. [read post]
11 Apr 2022, 11:57 pm
Senate Paul D. [read post]
24 Oct 2011, 9:43 am
, 14 Roger Williams U. [read post]
12 Apr 2011, 5:00 pm
TREATY ON EXTRADITION BETWEEN THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA AND CANADA TRAITE D’EXTRADITION ENTRE LES ETATS-UNIS D’AMERIQUE ET LE CANADA TEXT: BY THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA A PROCLAMATION CONSIDERING THAT: The Treaty on Extradition between the United States of America and Canada was signed at Washington on December 3, 1971, as amended by an exchange of notes on June 28 and July 9, 1974, the original of which Treaty, as amended, is hereto annexed; … [read post]
28 Oct 2015, 11:52 am
The 15-judge federal court of appeals for the Sixth Circuit has just handed down an interesting and important First Amendment decision. [read post]
19 Jul 2022, 6:14 am
John W. [read post]
30 Sep 2011, 1:48 am
(Silicon Valley IP Licensing Law Blog) US Patents No patent for claimed method of patenting (Patently-O) US Patents – Decisions CAFC: Disqualifying plaintiff’s litigation counsel based upon former joint defense agreement: In re Shared Memory Graphics LLC (Patently-O) (IPBiz) CAFC: No evidence for priority claim: Cordance v Amazon (IPBiz) CAFC dismisses for lack of jurisdiction: Spread Spectrum v Eastman Kodak (IPBiz) District Court E D Texas: Email processing… [read post]
26 Mar 2009, 6:48 am
Johns County Circuit Court. [read post]
2 Dec 2010, 8:45 am
Henry, why then there’d be no need for deliberation. [read post]
21 Feb 2007, 7:30 am
In this regard, the amazing John Robertson (who always manages to be right there with thoughtful analysis when a major bioethics issue emerges) has a recent article in the Hastings Center Report, that lays out the major policy issues. [read post]
9 Mar 2010, 10:02 am
See Roger v. [read post]
9 Nov 2010, 1:18 pm
John Rogers Smith, Associate Professor, Department of Petroleum Engineering, Louisiana State University; Darryl Bourgoyne, Director, Louisiana State University Petroleum Engineering Research and Technology; Marvin Odum, President, Shell Oil Company, and Upstream Americas Director, Royal Dutch Shell; and Rex Tillerson, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, ExxonMobil. [read post]
11 Feb 2020, 5:10 pm
Attorney John Crabb Jr. wrote, “the government defers to the Court as to what specific sentence is appropriate under the facts and circumstances of this case. [read post]
16 Mar 2015, 7:00 am
As to the latter, the judge found that `there is a record made on the computer that John Jones has sent Mary Smith a message on a particular day. [read post]
29 May 2024, 3:52 pm
For scholarly publications, Rule 10.7.1(d) adds a descriptive parenthetical note for citing cases where an enslaved person was involved, and provides examples like “Wall v. [read post]
