Search for: "John Doe Inc 1-2" Results 661 - 680 of 2,483
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Jan 2016, 1:42 pm by Eugene Volokh
Unsurprisingly, lower-court judges have disagreed on the subject; the 8th Circuit panel, for instance, split 2 to 1 on whether the exclusion under the Missouri program was constitutional. [read post]
21 Jun 2017, 7:59 am by John Elwood
John Elwood reviews Monday’s relists … barely. [read post]
17 Jan 2019, 7:58 pm by MOTP
" Orascom and Natgasoline filed a response asserting that appellate jurisdiction exists because this case involves (1) an appeal from a final judgment; or (2) a statutorily authorized interlocutory appeal; or (3) a mandamus proceeding. [read post]
31 Jan 2014, 7:11 am by John Elwood
§ 2254(d)(2) merely because the state court does not conduct an evidentiary hearing. [read post]
6 Nov 2008, 11:00 am
Va. 1992) and In re Dell, Inc., 71 USPQ2d 1725 (TTAB 2004), a webpage may be an acceptable specimen for a product if it (1) includes a picture of the relevant goods; (2) shows the mark associated with the goods; and (3) contains the necessary ordering information. [read post]
12 May 2010, 2:24 am by gmlevine
” In contrast, bad faith does not extend to those complaints “not well founded” but which contain no “fabrications or manifestly unsustainable positions,” Skyhook Wireless Inc. v. [read post]
4 Dec 2020, 3:21 am
 Mutilation: Trademark Rule 2.72 provides (emphasis by the Board):(a) In an application based on use in commerce under section 1(a) of the Act, the applicant may amend the description or drawing of the mark only if:…(2) The proposed amendment does not materially alter the mark. [read post]
16 Oct 2015, 7:08 am by John Elwood
John Elwood reviews Tuesday’s relisted cases. [read post]
27 Feb 2015, 6:15 am by John Elwood
John Elwood reviews Monday’s relisted cases. [read post]