Search for: "John Does 1-14" Results 661 - 680 of 2,914
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Feb 2012, 8:22 am by Michael Scutt
originally appeared on Jobsworth by Michael Scutt on 14/02/2012. [read post]
20 Mar 2012, 3:28 am by John L. Welch
See Section 14(1) of the Lanham Act.Note that the motion to dismiss was pending for seven months! [read post]
14 Dec 2009, 11:21 am
"Use the information for what it's worth and not just look at a name and go, 'Oh my gosh, my next door neighbor's name is John Doe. [read post]
23 Jun 2016, 12:51 pm by Jamie Markham
The bill does not clearly address whether the change would be retroactive to December 1, 2015. [read post]
23 Jun 2016, 12:51 pm by Jamie Markham
The bill does not clearly address whether the change would be retroactive to December 1, 2015. [read post]
7 Dec 2010, 8:12 am by Jonathan Bailey
Copyright Group has dropped some 97% of the John Does in its case over the alleged file sharing of the movie Far Cry. [read post]
20 Dec 2010, 4:30 am by John White
Does it go to an individual to incentivize further innovation? [read post]
22 Apr 2008, 10:17 am
John DonohueIn my view, Justice Scalia blundered badly last week in his concurring opinion in Baze v. [read post]
4 Jan 2008, 6:38 am
Therefore, with low privacy levels, John Doe's posting might become available world-wide via searches extremely quickly. [read post]
23 Feb 2007, 5:58 am
This Kat thinks that it certainly does, and also thinks that it mostly comes down to the fourth step of the test for patentability, as approved by Jacob LJ. [read post]