Search for: "Kitchen v. Kitchen" Results 661 - 680 of 1,928
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Dec 2016, 4:00 am by David Cheifetz
That issue had been recently canvassed – it was central to the decision – in Benhaim v. [read post]
9 Dec 2016, 1:00 pm
| The U.S. presidential election of 1876: votes, cannabis and intellectual property| CJEU upholds duty to reverse-engineer trade marks in Rubik's cube decision, but what about the actual v abstract test? [read post]
7 Dec 2016, 11:58 pm
 Claire referred to the HGS v Lilly [2011] UKSC 51 and Actavis v Lilly [2015] EWHC 3294 (Pat) cases as examples of patents which did not have data in them and yet were found to be plausible. [read post]
3 Dec 2016, 3:57 pm by Steve Bainbridge
Like Usha Rodrigues, I'm a big fan of Cook's Illustrated and the rest of the American test Kitchen family. [read post]
23 Nov 2016, 3:33 am by Robin Shea
In addition, the Sixth Circuit will be hearing the EEOC’s appeal of the lower court decision in EEOC v. [read post]
20 Nov 2016, 8:54 am by Andrew Delaney
 I'm just a bird with an expression that vaguely resembles the famous McKayla Maroney shot from 2012State v. [read post]
16 Nov 2016, 1:26 pm by Giles Peaker
The waste pipe to the kitchen sink was disconnected so the waste was pouring into a bucket. [read post]
10 Nov 2016, 7:04 am
 When should this "actual v abstract" test take place and on the basis of what criteria? [read post]
7 Nov 2016, 7:35 pm by Drew Falkenstein
Washing hands, kitchen work surfaces, and utensils with soap and water immediately after they have been in contact with raw food is also an effective preventive measure. [read post]
7 Nov 2016, 3:32 pm by Giles Peaker
After getting two 3 month ‘temporary dispensations’, Camelot finally applied for a licence and were granted one (with arguments over how many kitchens there were, as Camden would not allow more than 5 occupants per shared kitchen). [read post]
1 Nov 2016, 6:00 am by Jennifer
Ralph Nader's American Museum of Tort Law in Connecticut also hosts a small online shop, featuring t-shirts depicting the Brown v. [read post]
21 Oct 2016, 7:00 am by Orin Kerr
The government could argue that cases 2 and 3 are not testimonial under Doe v. [read post]
13 Oct 2016, 4:14 am
This question has been indirectly considered in two recent English cases: Karen Millen v Karen Millen Fashions Ltd and Skyscape Cloud Services Ltd v Sky Plc.The background to both cases is different.Skyscape supplies cloud computer services to organisations within the UK public sector. [read post]