Search for: "LAWS v. DAVIS" Results 661 - 680 of 6,272
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Jun 2022, 6:47 am by Samuel Bray
That is a super-timely question--see Whole Women's Health v. [read post]
21 Jun 2022, 1:34 pm by Giles Peaker
Khan v Mehmood (2022) EWCA Civ 791 (Housing Law Practitioners Association intervening) This was, it has to be said, in part a rather odd appeal to the Court of Appeal. [read post]
21 Jun 2022, 11:36 am by Giles Peaker
But the contrast with the earlier case of Contractreal Ltd v Davies (2001) EWCA Civ 928 was resolveable. [read post]
20 Jun 2022, 11:07 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Seth Davis, Eric Biber & Elena Kempf have published “Persistent Sovereignties” in the University of Pennsylvania Law Review. [read post]
20 Jun 2022, 3:11 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
“An attorney may not be held liable for failing to act outside the scope of a retainer” (Attallah v Milbank, Tweed, Hadley & McCloy, LLP, 168 AD3d 1026, 1028 [2d Dept 2019]; see AmBase Corp. v Davis Polk & Wardwell, 8 NY3d 428, 435 [2007]). [read post]
17 Jun 2022, 9:08 pm by Public Employment Law Press
Matter of Newman v City of Tonawanda 2022 NY Slip Op 03834 Decided on June 10, 2022 Appellate Division, Fourth Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. [read post]
17 Jun 2022, 9:08 pm by Public Employment Law Press
Matter of Newman v City of Tonawanda 2022 NY Slip Op 03834 Decided on June 10, 2022 Appellate Division, Fourth Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. [read post]
17 Jun 2022, 2:09 pm by admin
  Ever since the United States Supreme Court decided Daubert v. [read post]
17 Jun 2022, 3:44 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
” “It is well settled that “[a]n attorney may not be held liable for failing to act outside the scope of the retainer” (Genesis Merchant Partners, L.P. v Gilbride, Tusa, Last & Spellane, LLC, 157 AD3d 479,482 [1st Dept 2018], citingAmbase Corp. v Davis Polk & Wardell, 8 NY3d 428 [2007]). [read post]
”[15] Moreover, in response to the Commission’s 2010 guidance dozens of major law firms counseled clients regarding their climate-change related disclosure obligations under the securities laws.[16] Although law firm memoranda on that subject were often signed by former or future Commission officials, and many described policy objections to the guidance in detail, sophisticated coun [read post]
15 Jun 2022, 2:57 pm by Kara Simon and Chris Skelton
The Court has also found that Title IX requires schools to reasonably address sexual harassment by both teachers and students (Davis v. [read post]
13 Jun 2022, 12:39 am by INFORRM
The Media Law Podcast’s analysis can be found here. [read post]
11 Jun 2022, 12:26 pm by Eugene Volokh
This is evident, for instance, in the fact that all the Supreme Court's sexual harassment cases have been nonpseudonymous (except Davis as next friend of LaShonda D. v. [read post]
9 Jun 2022, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
Immediately prior to taking the position at Illinois in 2015, Amar served as the Senior Associate Dean for Academic Affairs and a Professor of Law at the UC Davis School of Law. [read post]
8 Jun 2022, 6:42 pm by Howard M. Wasserman
The court rejects Boule’s argument that a First Amendment retaliation claim is similar to the employment-discrimination claim the court allowed in Davis v. [read post]