Search for: "LR"
Results 661 - 680
of 690
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Jun 2018, 8:00 am
If the IRS hаѕ аlrеаdу dоnе this, thеn you need tо gаthеr оld tаx rеturn information to аltеr thеіr return, аnd you need to nоtіfу thе tаx expert you wоrk with know thаt thе IRS has submitted a tаx rеturn fоr уоu. [read post]
28 Mar 2016, 4:50 pm
Rohan Negandhi I am always pleased to be able to publish updates on important developments in other jurisdictions. [read post]
21 Oct 2010, 10:10 am
The Delhi High Court recently dealt with the precarious Delhi Master Plan 2021 and examined the legal position with regard to the Master Plan, in general, as well as the Master Plan 2021, as applicable to Delhi. [read post]
31 Mar 2015, 1:53 am
In Vidal-Hall v, Google Inc ([2015] EWCA Civ 311) the Court of Appeal dismissed Google’s appeal from the decision of Tugendhat J in which he declined to declare that the English court did not have jurisdiction to hear data protection and misuse of private information claims brought against it. [read post]
18 Jan 2011, 10:51 am
Justice SinghviThe Supreme Court in Ghisalal vs Dhapubai (D) By Lrs. has examined the provisions of the Hindu Adoption and Maintenance Act relating to adoption. [read post]
28 Dec 2013, 1:18 pm
This one has been sitting in my draft collection for a while, but, as Christmas fades towards the new year, it finally got done. [read post]
11 Jun 2023, 10:59 pm
(2023) 97 ALJR 276; [2023] HCA 11, [43]–[46]; Schibsby v Westenholz (1870) LR 6 QB 155, 159. [read post]
28 Dec 2013, 1:18 pm
This one has been sitting in my draft collection for a while, but, as Christmas fades towards the new year, it finally got done. [read post]
31 Jul 2011, 9:00 am
N.C Budharaj (deceased) by LRs and Others, (2001) 2 SCC 721, another Constitution Bench considered payment of interest for pre-reference period in respect of cases arising when Interest Act, 1839 was in force. [read post]
4 Nov 2019, 6:44 am
Overhauser Law Offices, the publisher of this site, assists with US and foreign patent searches, patent applications and assists with enforcing patents via infringement litigation and licensing. [read post]
14 Jun 2019, 1:57 pm
Death in Copyright: Remarks on Duration by Abraham Drassinower, University of Toronto Faculty of LawWhat would a rights based account of duration look like? [read post]
2 Mar 2018, 8:51 am
The Benefits of Moving Following the Loss of a Loved One I’m Ed Smith, a Sacramento wrongful death lawyer. [read post]
17 Aug 2009, 8:00 pm
En cumplimiento del mencionado acuerdo LR envió cinco cheques, dos de los cuales no fueron pagados. [read post]
24 Mar 2010, 4:32 am
I have earlier written articles on the application of law of Arbitration to the Company disputes and especially the impact of the Arbitration Agreement on the jurisdiction of the Company Law Board and the Company Court. [read post]
4 May 2011, 11:12 am
The Supreme Court in Surya Devi Rai v. [read post]
7 Oct 2010, 1:53 pm
It is not based on section 75(2)(o).The difficulty I have with the Kennon principle as a part of the contribution based division can be illustrated by reference to an anecdote recounted by the great American judge and jurist Oliver Wendell Holmes in his article The Path of the Law (10 Harv, LR Rev. 457 (1897)). [read post]
15 Feb 2024, 9:01 pm
Good afternoon. [read post]
11 Apr 2023, 6:24 pm
[Bullet speed matters, but so does bullet weight] According to "assault weapon" ban proponents, the AR rifle's lethality is all about how fast its bullets travel. [read post]
10 May 2010, 11:30 pm
His recent publications include ‘The Significance of Close Connection’ in Ahern and Binchy, The Rome II Regulation on the Law Applicable to Non-Contractual Obligations (Nijhoff, 2009) , and ‘Choice of Law in Europe: Uniformity and Integration’ (2008) 82 Tulane LR 2021. [read post]
3 Feb 2012, 1:52 am
“We are under a Constitution, but the Constitution is what the judges say it is… “-- Charles Evans Hughes, 11th Chief Justice of the United States.[1]ADNAN M L KARIMBarrister-at-Law The Supreme Court has declared the Fifth Amendment to the Constitution illegal and void ab initio; condemning military rules in explicit language[2]. [read post]
