Search for: "Lawrence S. Petit"
Results 661 - 680
of 813
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Jan 2018, 5:28 pm
Affirming the trial court, the appellate court denied the Council’s petition. [read post]
25 Apr 2016, 4:21 pm
Ashutosh Bhagwat, Richard Garnett, Andrew Koppelman, Seth Kreimer, Lawrence Lessig, Sanford Levinson, Robert O’Neil, David Post, Lawrence Sager, Seana Shiffrin, Steven Shiffrin, Geoffrey Stone, Nadine Strossen, William Van Alstyne and James Weinstein. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 2:00 pm
While the petition was pending, the Second Circuit did issue its ruling. [read post]
18 Nov 2014, 9:51 am
Bui, Third Circuit: Appellant's petition for habeas corpus should have been granted because he received ineffective assistance of counsel. [read post]
15 Mar 2010, 8:31 am
S. [read post]
25 Nov 2019, 11:00 am
For the symposium on David S. [read post]
13 Feb 2009, 9:54 am
When Baumann returned signed copies of the petition to Potter he expressed approval and t [read post]
3 Jun 2008, 3:19 pm
(At least one person has emailed me to suggest that the proponents should have to rewrite the proposition and go through another round of petitioning, because the petition they submitted is now invalid, and perhaps some litigator would like to take this on as a theory to forestall the November 4 vote.) [read post]
27 Jan 2015, 9:01 pm
One development that both reflected and reinforced the shift in favor of marriage equality was the Supreme Court’s 2003 ruling in Lawrence v. [read post]
27 Oct 2011, 7:47 am
Petition for certiorari Rehberg filed a petition for writ of certiorari presenting a single question: whether a government official who acts as a “complaining witness” by presenting perjured testimony against an innocent citizen is entitled to absolute immunity from a Section 1983 claim for civil damages. [read post]
17 Nov 2022, 7:42 am
Lawrence, 365 N.C. 506 (2012). [read post]
21 Oct 2012, 9:01 pm
Supreme Court held in Lawrence v. [read post]
24 Jan 2022, 7:36 pm
Murphy’s article Punitive Damages, Explanatory Verdicts, and the Hard Look is cited in § 4:32 of the following practice series: Lawrence G. [read post]
1 Mar 2013, 8:11 am
Windsor herself has argued that Section 3 does not pass muster even on rational-basis review (see pages 32-62 of her brief), and the United States has argued (see pp. 52-53 of its brief) that Section 3 at a minimum does not pass muster under Justice O’Connor’s conception (in Lawrence) of the “more searching form of rational basis review” the Court has applied in cases such as Romer, Cleburne, and Moreno.) [read post]
25 Nov 2014, 5:21 pm
Ullman, 367 U.S. 497, 502-03, 508 (plurality opinion) (1961) (Connecticut practice respecting ban on contraceptive use); Lawrence v. [read post]
20 Sep 2017, 3:27 am
” More frequently, though, petitioning is done by filing a lawsuit. [read post]
23 Mar 2016, 12:17 pm
Circuit with a petition. [read post]
17 Nov 2006, 11:59 am
Law Judge Lawrence W. [read post]
25 Jan 2015, 9:01 pm
What the Rephrased Questions Mean Ordinarily, when the Supreme Court grants a petition for review, it accepts the petitioner’s framing of the issue. [read post]
25 Jan 2015, 9:01 pm
What the Rephrased Questions Mean Ordinarily, when the Supreme Court grants a petition for review, it accepts the petitioner’s framing of the issue. [read post]
