Search for: "Little v. Ives"
Results 661 - 680
of 1,645
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Dec 2009, 10:13 am
Judge Saris’s district court opinion denying the motion to exclude one of the plaintiff’s economic experts in Natchitoches Parish Hospital v. [read post]
1 Aug 2012, 2:18 pm
Stallone, I circulate a copy of the Rocky IV DVD [read post]
8 Dec 2011, 3:44 pm
A little more information from my probate seminar given on Tuesday at the Sacramento Radisson. [read post]
7 Jan 2016, 6:43 am
Whole Woman’s Health v. [read post]
6 Feb 2011, 11:36 pm
I’ve been gone from the blawgosphere for what seems like an eternity — I looked at the little calendar thing on the right for January, and for the first time since I started law:/dev/null there were more days without entries posted than with them As you can probably guess, I had totally overcommitted myself this semester. [read post]
10 Aug 2012, 8:06 am
V. [read post]
19 Feb 2014, 4:52 am
The upshot of the points, taken together, is that Hobby Lobby's own brief calls into serious question whether the plaintiffs have alleged facts sufficient to establish that the HHS rule imposes a substantial burden on their exercise of religion.As for the first question: Hobby Lobby's brief, like Conestoga Wood's, confirms that these cases are not really about the question of corporate religious exercise that has dominated the briefing and public reporting.Hobby Lobby makes… [read post]
6 Aug 2010, 11:46 am
United States v. [read post]
30 Nov 2020, 7:21 am
Doe I and Cargill, Inc. v. [read post]
9 Jul 2024, 11:28 am
Pix Credit hereGroovin' slow and easy, just takin' our timeWe ain't goin' nowhere, for baby I don't mindSo put your arms around mewe're gonna take a journey down to rhythm and bluesRidin' on a soul train, yeah baby just-a me and you (lyrics Soultrain, here)This post considers, quite briefly, reflections on several points that may weigh significantly on the way in which one approaches the inevitable and now unstoppable trend toward AI regulation production, and its… [read post]
14 Apr 2009, 9:20 am
Thanks, Hugo Cox, for drawing the IPKat's attention to this action before the little-known EFTA Court in Case E-1/09 EFTA Surveillance Authority v Principality of Liechtenstein, brought on 3 February 2009. [read post]
1 Jul 2012, 9:12 am
Physico-mechanicall iv. 46 The sides of the Bladder grew flaccid. 1705 F. [read post]
2 Oct 2010, 4:26 pm
In five sequential violations of Canon IV.9, Bishop Jefferts Schori (1) trumped up charges (which did not satisfy the Canon's requirements) against the Rt. [read post]
28 Jul 2011, 2:00 am
In Oppenheimer v. [read post]
6 Aug 2009, 9:32 am
For a more comprehensive discussion, see US v. [read post]
3 Jun 2015, 2:29 pm
Title IV is concerned with reform of the FISA Court. [read post]
23 Jul 2012, 6:20 am
Association of Private Sector Colleges and Universities v. [read post]
1 Feb 2022, 7:01 am
Honourable mentions F-V, 3.2.4 – new example of lack of unity in claims with multiple dependencies. [read post]
6 Jun 2020, 4:59 pm
[iv] If there is no direct evidence of such an agreement, plaintiffs must show there was parallel action—where the defendants all acted in unison and the behavior “would probably not result from chance, coincidence, independent responses to common stimuli, or mere interdependence unaided by an advance understanding among the parties”[v]—and “plus factors” which show collusion. [read post]
6 Apr 2020, 2:50 pm
ServPro Intellectual Property, Inc. v. [read post]
