Search for: "Little v. King" Results 661 - 680 of 1,363
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Sep 2006, 4:10 pm
New York is one of the very few jurisdictions that has found specific IP agreements champertous in the recent past:Refac Int'l, Ltd. v. [read post]
22 Oct 2007, 5:10 am
Parklex Assoc., 15 Misc 3d 1125(A), 2007 WL 1203617, *5 [Sup Ct, Kings County 2007][attorneys could not rely on purported waiver of conflict of interest where such conflict could subject an attorney to disciplinary action under DR-105, 22 NYCRR §1200.24(c)]; Booth v. [read post]
9 Feb 2010, 3:09 pm by Berin Szoka
Having privacy management tools like those offered by Google Buzz and Facebook will probably make us all a little more careful and perhaps even a tad bit more honest. [read post]
5 Nov 2014, 9:27 am by Wells Bennett
At any rate, the burden is on the plaintiffs, under the Amnesty v. [read post]
6 Jul 2013, 5:04 pm by Larry Catá Backer
No one, including the king (and thereafter the state) had power to usurp or interfere with the enjoyment by the people of their rights, customs and privileges unless lawfully entitled. [read post]
8 Nov 2021, 4:42 pm by Amy Howe
ShareThe Supreme Court heard oral argument on Monday in Federal Bureau of Investigation v. [read post]
28 May 2009, 8:05 pm by Matt Cameron
But I have to say a few things about the First Circuit’s thoughtful and eminently humane ruling in Taing v. [read post]
22 Sep 2022, 8:56 pm by Mark Ashton
Super. 161    (Sept. 21, 2022)  Bender, Dubrow & King w/o dissent/concurrence Nota bene: A judicial friend sent me a copy of Shoemaker v. [read post]
26 Nov 2019, 12:50 pm by Steve Gottlieb
FEC, 572 U.S. 185 (2014) (aggregate statutory limit on political donations did little to prevent quid pro quos); Skilling v. [read post]
16 Jul 2012, 2:52 pm by admin
The brief also argues that the broad interpretation of Section 109 does not conflict with Quality King Distribs., Inc. v. [read post]
5 Nov 2017, 4:30 pm by INFORRM
New Zealand The Court of Appeal handed down judgment in the case of Hagaman v Little ([2017] NZCA 447). [read post]
30 Apr 2024, 8:37 am by Will Baude
  In Britain, the maxim "the King can do no wrong" reflected that the sovereignty of the King was incompatible with his amenability to legal process. [read post]
28 Jan 2023, 8:00 am by Guest Blogger
He was just six years old when the Court decided Brown v. [read post]