Search for: "Lyle Roberts" Results 661 - 680 of 878
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Jun 2010, 7:11 am by Jay Willis
Juvenile Male; Lyle Denniston of SCOTUSblog also covers the Court’s unusual order. [read post]
12 Oct 2011, 10:52 am by Conor McEvily
At this blog, Lyle reports on the Court’s “truly rare order” yesterday denying the Solicitor General’s motion for divided argument in Rehberg v. [read post]
16 Apr 2010, 7:24 am by Anna Christensen
 (Lyle Denniston also previewed the upcoming oral argument yesterday for this blog.) [read post]
24 Feb 2012, 6:54 am by Joshua Matz
”  Other coverage of the oral argument comes from Robert Barnes in the Washington Post, who reports that the Court is “conflicted about prosecuting those who lie about military valor,” while Bill Mears of CNN describes the Justices as “show[ing] a surprising amount of support for the federal Stolen Valor Act. [read post]
3 Jun 2014, 6:05 am by Amy Howe
Roberts, Jr., held that the federal laws do not apply to Bond. [read post]
24 Jul 2012, 12:43 pm by Donald Childress
 [Lyle published an introduction to the issues in the case at the start of the symposium.] [read post]
2 Nov 2016, 4:56 am by Edith Roberts
At his eponymous blog, Lyle Denniston reports that in a brief filed in federal district court in the District of Columbia on Monday, the “U.S. [read post]
29 Jun 2018, 4:17 am by Edith Roberts
Additional coverage comes from Ann Flaherty at the Associated Press, Robert Barnes for The Washington Post, Lyle Denniston at Constitution Daily, here and here, Amanda Reilly at E&E News, Ariel Wittenberg, also at E&E News, an NPR Politics podcast, Scott Bomboy at Constitution Daily, and David Lat at Above the Law. [read post]
2 Jul 2013, 7:32 am by Sarah Erickson-Muschko
In his column for Bloomberg View, Noah Feldman discusses Justice Scalia’s recent criticism of “the younger conservatives who were supposed to be the heirs to his mantle: Chief Justice John Roberts . . . and Justice Samuel Alito. [read post]
6 Jun 2018, 4:29 am by Edith Roberts
” At The Economist’s Democracy in America blog, Steven Mazie observes that “[s]ix months passed between the hearing and the ruling in Masterpiece,” a delay he suggests may stem from Chief Justice Roberts’ behind-the-scenes efforts “to lower the temperature where possible, even if that means avoiding giving clear guidance on where gay rights end and religious freedom begins. [read post]
20 Jun 2017, 4:29 am by Edith Roberts
” In The Washington Post, Robert Barnes reports on Gill, noting that the “Supreme Court has never found a plan unconstitutional because of partisan gerrymandering,” and that “[i]f it does, it would have a revolutionary impact on the reapportionment that comes after the 2020 election. [read post]
19 Jun 2018, 4:00 am by Edith Roberts
” Additional coverage comes from Adam Liptak for The New York Times, Richard Wolf at USA Today and Robert Barnes for The Washington Post. [read post]
23 Apr 2010, 3:19 am by Lisa McElroy
  Does it mean that Chief Justice Roberts, who authored the opinion, thinks it’s OK to hurt little animals? [read post]
29 Apr 2010, 6:51 am by Erin Miller
 Lyle Denniston of this blog writes that, after the argument, “the strong impression was that it might be exceedingly hard to gather a five-vote majority to establish such a right. [read post]
20 May 2019, 8:24 am by Berry Law Firm
Langley – Beatrice – Pleasant View Cemetery, Pickrell, NE Lyle E. [read post]
13 Apr 2020, 6:31 am by Marcia Coyle
You have been in the excellent hands of my wonderful friend and colleague Lyle Denniston and I hope to do nearly as well in the coming weeks. [read post]
18 Mar 2019, 3:52 am by Edith Roberts
” For The Washington Post, Robert Barnes reports that “[w]hen the U.S. [read post]
6 Oct 2017, 4:01 am by Edith Roberts
Additional coverage comes from Richard Wolf for USA Today, Lawrence Hurley at Reuters, Greg Stohr at Bloomberg, Lyle Denniston at his eponymous blog, and Robert Barnes for The Washington Post, who reports that “[t]he Trump administration told the Supreme Court … that there is no reason for the court to rule on the legality of the president’s previous bans on travel from certain countries, and that lower court rulings against the president’s position should… [read post]