Search for: "Lynch v. State" Results 661 - 680 of 1,534
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Sep 2017, 10:12 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
Eventually, they killed him with live bullets, knife still in hand.The case is Estate of Jaquez v. [read post]
4 Nov 2014, 2:13 am by Walter Olson
Justice Scalia on the rule of lenity in U.S. v. [read post]
16 Jan 2016, 8:00 pm by John Ehrett
Lynch 15-583Issue: Whether the district court can refuse to apply the Newman v. [read post]
9 May 2011, 2:03 am by Blog Editorial
R (Cart) v The Upper Tribunal; Eba v Advocate General for Scotland (Scotland); and R (MR (Pakistan)) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 14 – 17 March 2011. [read post]
15 Nov 2016, 7:23 am by Juan C. Antúnez
Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner, & Smith, Inc., 292 F.3d 1334, 1339 (11th Cir. 2002), abrogated on other grounds by Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc. v. [read post]
2 Dec 2015, 5:07 am by Amy Howe
Briefly: In his column for Bloomberg View, Noah Feldman discusses Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner, & Smith v. [read post]
15 Nov 2016, 7:23 am by Juan C. Antúnez
Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner, & Smith, Inc., 292 F.3d 1334, 1339 (11th Cir. 2002), abrogated on other grounds by Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc. v. [read post]
7 Feb 2016, 11:37 am by New York Criminal Defense
 In Leary v United States, 395 US 6, 33 [1969], the Supreme Court held that “a criminal statutory presumption must be regarded as ‘irrational’ or ‘arbitrary,’ and hence unconstitutional, unless it can at least be said with substantial assurance that the presumed fact is more likely than not to flow from the proved fact on which it is made to depend. [read post]
7 Feb 2016, 11:37 am by Donald Thompson
 In Leary v United States, 395 US 6, 33 [1969], the Supreme Court held that “a criminal statutory presumption must be regarded as ‘irrational’ or ‘arbitrary,’ and hence unconstitutional, unless it can at least be said with substantial assurance that the presumed fact is more likely than not to flow from the proved fact on which it is made to depend. [read post]
24 Mar 2010, 6:11 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
Former State Senator Hiram Monserrate lost his expedited appeal that challenges his expulsion from the Senate after he was convicted on a domestic violence offense.The case is Monserrate v. [read post]