Search for: "Lynch v. State" Results 661 - 680 of 1,575
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Sep 2017, 10:12 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
Eventually, they killed him with live bullets, knife still in hand.The case is Estate of Jaquez v. [read post]
13 Nov 2024, 10:20 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
The state has traditionally outlawed guns in these locations where vulnerable populations congregate.The Court of Appeals (Jacobs, Lynch and Lee) next determines whether the state law prohibiting guns in places of worship violates the Second Amendment. [read post]
14 Dec 2013, 11:57 am by Venkat Balasubramani
CareFlite * Accessing an Employee’s Facebook Posts by “Shoulder Surfing” a Coworker’s Page States Privacy Claim — Ehling v. [read post]
14 May 2015, 11:55 am by Peter Margulies
As the Second Circuit said in the landmark 1984 FISA case, United States v. [read post]
4 Nov 2014, 2:13 am by Walter Olson
Justice Scalia on the rule of lenity in U.S. v. [read post]
19 Sep 2011, 3:36 am
Reimbursing the employer for certain Section 207-c benefits it paid to individual returned to part-time employment Lynch v South Nyack/Grandview Police Department., 276 A.D.2d 63 The Lynch decision has two important elements, one of significance to employers; the other of significance to employees. [read post]
16 Jan 2016, 8:00 pm by John Ehrett
Lynch 15-583Issue: Whether the district court can refuse to apply the Newman v. [read post]
9 May 2011, 2:03 am by Blog Editorial
R (Cart) v The Upper Tribunal; Eba v Advocate General for Scotland (Scotland); and R (MR (Pakistan)) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 14 – 17 March 2011. [read post]
15 Nov 2016, 7:23 am by Juan C. Antúnez
Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner, & Smith, Inc., 292 F.3d 1334, 1339 (11th Cir. 2002), abrogated on other grounds by Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc. v. [read post]
7 Feb 2016, 11:37 am by Donald Thompson
 In Leary v United States, 395 US 6, 33 [1969], the Supreme Court held that “a criminal statutory presumption must be regarded as ‘irrational’ or ‘arbitrary,’ and hence unconstitutional, unless it can at least be said with substantial assurance that the presumed fact is more likely than not to flow from the proved fact on which it is made to depend. [read post]
7 Feb 2016, 11:37 am by New York Criminal Defense
 In Leary v United States, 395 US 6, 33 [1969], the Supreme Court held that “a criminal statutory presumption must be regarded as ‘irrational’ or ‘arbitrary,’ and hence unconstitutional, unless it can at least be said with substantial assurance that the presumed fact is more likely than not to flow from the proved fact on which it is made to depend. [read post]