Search for: "MANN v. STATE" Results 661 - 680 of 936
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Apr 2012, 6:24 am by Conor McEvily
Finally, at this blog Ronald Mann reports on Monday’s oral argument in RadLAX Gateway Hotel, LLC v. [read post]
23 Apr 2012, 6:19 am by Marissa Miller
At this blog, Ronald Mann analyzes Wednesday’s opinion in Kappos v. [read post]
5 Apr 2012, 8:13 am by McNabb Associates, P.C.
Mann said federal prosecutors could have gone a different route in seeking to take Pleau into custody but are now bound by their choice, which gives Chafee the authority to keep Pleau in state prison. [read post]
8 Mar 2012, 3:07 am by sally
Supreme Court W (Algeria) & Anor v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2012] UKSC 8 (7 March 2012) Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Gedeon Richter Plc v Bayer Pharma AG [2012] EWCA Civ 235 (07 March 2012) Miah & Ors v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2012] EWCA Civ 261 (07 March 2012) Lamichhane v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2012] EWCA Civ 260 (07 March 2012) Zieleniewski v Scheyd… [read post]
3 Mar 2012, 11:32 am by John McFarland
This week, the Texas Supreme Court denied Denbury Green Pipeline's motion for rehearing in Texas Rice Land Partners v. [read post]
29 Feb 2012, 2:06 pm by Orin Kerr
United States, 436 U.S. 128, 130-43 (1978); United States v. [read post]
27 Feb 2012, 12:38 pm by Steve Hall
Supreme Court's ruling in Maples v. [read post]
23 Feb 2012, 7:34 am by Kiran Bhat
Ronald Mann reports on Tuesday’s arguments in Freeman v. [read post]
22 Feb 2012, 11:22 am by Karwan Eskerie
Hurley and Moore v Secretary of State for Business, Innovation and Skills [2012] EWHC 201- read judgment This judgment, the latest in an expanding list of decisions on challenges to the Coalition government’s spending cuts, is an interesting example of judicial restraint and deference to the government on issues of macro-policy, at a time when the extent of judicial intervention into political decision-making is the subject of much debate in the legal profession and academia,… [read post]
21 Feb 2012, 6:54 am by Nabiha Syed
Elsewhere, coverage looks ahead to Wednesday’s scheduled oral argument in United States v. [read post]
13 Feb 2012, 1:30 am by INFORRM
The Financial Times has reproduced New International CEO Tom Mockridge’s memo to staff here (subscription required), which states “We must take care not to prejudge the outcome of the police interviews. [read post]
9 Feb 2012, 10:39 am
Therefore, the MR concluded (at para 83): Accordingly, I would dismiss these appeals, as: i) Much of the information on the voicemail messages of the claimants which have been intercepted by Mr Mulcaire is likely to have been 'commercial information or other intellectual property' within section 72(5); ii) Although some of the information was not 'commercial information or other intellectual property', and, in Ms Phillips's case, the confidence may have been that of her… [read post]
1 Feb 2012, 8:41 am by 1 Crown Office Row
On 17 November 2010, Mann J held that Mr Mulcaire was not entitled to rely on the PSI ([2010] EWHC 2952 (Ch)). [read post]