Search for: "MATTER OF R T"
Results 661 - 680
of 53,431
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Oct 2022, 10:30 pm
CO: She ain't goin to tell you that. [read post]
24 Mar 2008, 1:42 pm
You don't need a list. [read post]
27 Jan 2016, 8:00 am
Why it Matters. [read post]
2 Mar 2015, 3:26 am
Formalities that Matter [new section to Chapter 6] copyright 2015 Carter G. [read post]
9 Jun 2010, 1:02 pm
PETER SUDERMAN: Media Matters (To Itself): What Helen Thomas’s career has to do with the FTC’s push to reinvent journalism. [read post]
29 Nov 2012, 9:34 am
The Circuit Court applied the subject matter waiver doctrine and granted the motion to compel, and the Appellate Court affirmed. [read post]
22 Sep 2010, 3:02 pm
J 20/85, [4(a)] and J 3/90) and is intended to ensure that the parties to the proceedings are not taken by surprise by grounds mentioned in an adverse decision (cf. inter alia T 669/90; T 892/92; T 594/00 and T 343/01, see “Case Law of the Boards of Appeal of the EPO, 5th edition 2006, VI.B.1, page 322). [read post]
7 Feb 2012, 3:30 am
Don’t get me wrong. [read post]
28 Feb 2007, 4:18 am
HATEFUL BLOG COMMENTS DON'T MATTER: Except when they do. [read post]
3 Dec 2009, 3:05 pm
The petition for review was filed by the patentee after the Board in decision T 15/07 had revoked the opposed patent. [read post]
17 May 2020, 2:17 pm
“Tack för idag” means “thank you for today” in Swedish. [read post]
16 Feb 2011, 3:01 pm
By choosing the option of OPs rather than a third notification, the ED has acted within the margin of manoeuvre provided by A 94(3) and R 71(1). [read post]
22 Dec 2009, 3:04 pm
In the minutes of the oral proceedings (OPs) before the OD it is indicated "regarding the matter of the late filing of documents D8 to D11, the opponent explained essentially that this was in reaction to the provisional opinion set out by the opposition division in its annex to the invitation to the OPs". [read post]
17 May 2012, 11:47 am
Regular or decaf doesn’t matter. [read post]
13 Dec 2011, 5:01 pm
The OD referred to the date set under R 71a EPC 1973 and to the fact that the letter dated 16 January 2008 was not in their file. [read post]
6 Feb 2013, 5:01 pm
Under R 80 the proprietor was entitled to react to a new factual situation by making “appropriate and necessary amendments” occasioned by grounds of opposition. [read post]
10 Feb 2015, 12:04 pm
There’s a basic fact of modern consumer finance: size matters. [read post]
3 May 2010, 1:03 pm
(Eugene Volokh) One refrain I saw in some of the comments on the Harvard e-mail matter (and heard in a personal conversation) is that we shouldn’t much worry about the reaction to the e-mail’s author, because she wasn’t really a scientist. [read post]
14 Sep 2019, 11:00 am
A clear response at r/AmItheAsshole.I'm a big fan of r/AmItheAsshole and have read all the entries for the last few weeks. [read post]
15 Feb 2011, 9:19 am
Who says size doesn't matter? [read post]
