Search for: "Maines v. Secretary of State"
Results 661 - 680
of 906
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Mar 2012, 5:19 am
PP v Secretary of State for the Home Department, (formerly VV [Jordan]), PP v SSHD, W & BB v SSHD and Z, G, U & Y v SSHD, heard 30 – 31 January 2012. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 1:52 am
In the main, it aims to strike a balance between free speech and the preservation of law and order. [read post]
7 Mar 2012, 4:11 am
The Secretary of State had two main objections to such an order being made. [read post]
5 Mar 2012, 7:13 am
So here's a summary of my most significant blog posts on the CVD/NME issue and the court case (GPX Int'l Tire Corp. v. [read post]
29 Feb 2012, 11:00 pm
As was widely reported at the time of the tribunal decision in 2007, Chindamo’s arguments under the Human Rights Act played second fiddle to the main thrust of his case, which was founded on of EU freedom of movement law. [read post]
27 Feb 2012, 3:49 pm
On the contrary, one of the main obligations it imposes on states is to protect against human rights abuses committed by non-state actors, including corporations. [read post]
22 Feb 2012, 11:22 am
It did, however, grant a declaration that in reaching that decision, the Secretary of State for Business, Innovation and Skills had failed fully to comply with his public sector equality duties. [read post]
20 Feb 2012, 5:22 am
PP v Secretary of State for the Home Department, (formerly VV [Jordan]), PP v SSHD, W & BB v SSHD and Z, G, U & Y v SSHD, heard 30 – 31 January 2012. [read post]
9 Feb 2012, 1:29 pm
” Commonwealth v. [read post]
7 Feb 2012, 2:31 pm
It's not quite eleven-a-side, but the much-contested case of Football Association Premier League Ltd, NetMed Hellas SA, Multichoice Hellas SA, Union de Associations de Football, British Sky Broadcasting Limited, Setanta Sports SARL, Group Canal Plus SA and The Motion Picture Association v QC Leisure, David Richardson, AV Station plc, Malcolm Chamberlain, Michael Madden, Sanjay Raval, David Greenslade, SR Leisure Ltd, Philip George Charles Houghton and Derek Owen; The Secretary… [read post]
3 Feb 2012, 1:52 am
Since both the United States and India are federations, invariably the Superior Courts in those jurisdictions are called on to decide when there appears to be any conflict between state and federal legislation or a question of legislative competence arises. [read post]
30 Jan 2012, 5:23 pm
Unfortunately, we consider that the core proposals in the Green Paper – to give discretion to the Secretary of State to trigger the use of secret evidence in any civil proceedings – pose a serious, unnecessary and unjustifiable interference with the common law principle of open justice. [read post]
29 Jan 2012, 12:59 pm
If the assertion differs from existing USCIS policy, point out the difference and cite Judulang v. [read post]
27 Jan 2012, 5:47 am
The Appeal The main ground of appeal was based on the common law right of access to court, established in Raymond v Honey [1983 1 AC.1, 13] and a series of pre Human Rights cases such as R v Secretary of State for the Home Department, Ex parte Leech [1994] QB 198, and R (Anufrijeva) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2004] 1 AC 604 at 621[26]. [read post]
25 Jan 2012, 10:34 am
Apart from its import for U.S. detention policy generally, the development, if true, may have bearing on the factual underpinnings in Al Maqaleh v. [read post]
24 Jan 2012, 8:03 am
The secretary of state clearly is an officer. [read post]
17 Jan 2012, 7:10 am
The European Court of Human Rights has issued a ruling (Othman (Abu Qatada) v. [read post]
12 Jan 2012, 7:30 am
The Illinois Secretary of State Police; Elgin, Ill., Police Department; Seymour, Ind., Police Department; and Indiana State Police provided substantial assistance. [read post]
12 Jan 2012, 7:30 am
The Illinois Secretary of State Police; Elgin, Ill., Police Department; Seymour, Ind., Police Department; and Indiana State Police provided substantial assistance. [read post]
10 Jan 2012, 4:49 am
The Northern Ireland Act 1998 has therefore never really been regarded as something that can/should sustain a legally sovereign legislature, even if the Act has been described as a “constitutional statute” (see Robinson v Secretary of State for Northern Ireland [2002] UKHL 32). [read post]
