Search for: "Mark E. Howe"
Results 661 - 680
of 7,540
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Aug 2017, 3:28 am
In a six-page opinion, the Board affirmed a Section 2(e)(1) refusal of GOLDEN DOODLE, finding the proposed mark merely descriptive of "On-line retail gift shops; On-line retail store services featuring apparel and accessories; Retail store services featuring apparel, accessories and gifts. [read post]
3 Feb 2021, 3:45 am
The USPTO refused to register the proposed mark CAFFREY for "plumbing products, namely, faucets, showerheads and toilets; lighting products, namely, lighting fixtures," deeming the mark to be primarily merely a surname under Section 2(e)(4). [read post]
23 Jun 2022, 1:59 am
That is not quite how the judgment is put, but the result is the same. [read post]
19 Dec 2018, 2:59 am
How do you think this came out? [read post]
9 Apr 2015, 5:32 am
This was also the time that there was still substantial skepticism how far to allow trade mark protection to go beyond the classic conceptualization of the trade mark right. [read post]
14 Dec 2009, 2:29 am
How would you have argued the appeal? [read post]
11 Dec 2006, 5:44 am
Mark and his caregivers attempt to find the author of this mysterious note, in hope of answers to how and why Mark's life suddently turned tragic. [read post]
11 Dec 2006, 5:44 am
Mark and his caregivers attempt to find the author of this mysterious note, in hope of answers to how and why Mark's life suddently turned tragic. [read post]
11 Aug 2016, 3:26 am
How do you think this came out? [read post]
13 Nov 2015, 3:36 am
How do you think this came out? [read post]
17 Mar 2020, 3:12 am
The USPTO refused to register the mark MOBILIZER for "massage apparatus and instruments," deeming the mark merely descriptive under Section 2(e)(1). [read post]
5 Jun 2015, 3:15 am
" How do you think this came out? [read post]
6 Aug 2014, 6:36 am
How did it all go sour? [read post]
25 Jun 2010, 2:59 am
" AMI Senior Vice President of Regulatory Affairs and General Counsel Mark Dopp, agreed with Hodges. [read post]
2 Aug 2018, 4:26 am
The USPTO refused registration of EAST END for "Alcoholic beverages, except beers, ales, stouts, ciders and wines; alcoholic beverages, namely, distilled spirits, vodka," finding the mark to be primarily geographically descriptive under Section 2(e)(2). [read post]
31 Mar 2016, 8:51 am
If no, then how far can legislation go to legislate for this? [read post]
11 Jul 2016, 12:32 pm
* e-Sport in the French Digital Republic Bill Katfriend Jean-Sébastien Mariez introduces the new draft regulation on e-Sport adopted by the French Parliament. [read post]
10 Mar 2015, 3:56 am
Therefore, the Board reversed the Section 2(e)(2) refusal.Read comments and post your comment hereTTABlog note: So how did you do? [read post]
20 Jun 2012, 2:32 am
The Board has again dismissed Opposer's Section 2(e)(1) claim, finding that Triumph's marks have acquired distinctiveness. [read post]
27 Nov 2008, 6:46 pm
Neither the IPKat nor Merpel are exactly in favour of Q****M as a trade mark either -- the only thing that can be said about it is that, if it should ever come before an OHIM Board of Appeal in a Community trade mark opposition, they can almost visualise the paragraph of the decision which, in dealing with aural similarity, explains how this word would be pronounced. [read post]
